Benchmark Almanac

NOVA-63

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 59.1% leads since Feb 2026 Fading

Models answer questions written by native speakers in 14 languages across 63 academic disciplines. Scoring is accuracy.

The Hugging Face dataset is empty and marked under review, and nearly all reported scores come from Qwen.

In the authors’ words

The multilingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have attracted considerable attention over the past decade. Assessing the accuracy with which LLMs provide answers in multilingual contexts is essential for determining their level of multilingual proficiency. Nevertheless, existing multilingual benchmarks generally reveal severe drawbacks, such as overly translated content (translationese), the absence of difficulty control, constrained diversity, and disciplinary imbalance, making the benchmarking process unreliable and showing low convincingness. To alleviate those shortcomings, we introduce NOVA-63 (Native Omni-lingual Versatile Assessments of 63 Disciplines), a comprehensive, difficult multilingual benchmark featuring 93,536 questions sourced from native speakers across 14 languages and 63 academic disciplines. Leveraging a robust pipeline that integrates LLM-assisted formatting, expert quality verification, and multi-level difficulty screening, NOVA-63 is balanced on disciplines with consistent difficulty standards while maintaining authentic linguistic elements. Extensive experimentation with current LLMs has shown significant insights into cross-lingual consistency among language families, and exposed notable disparities in models’ capabilities across various disciplines. This work provides valuable benchmarking data for the future development of multilingual models. Furthermore, our findings underscore the importance of moving beyond overall scores and instead conducting fine-grained analyses of model performance.

Abstract of NOVA-63: Native Omni-lingual Versatile Assessments of 63 Disciplines (ACL 2025.emnlp-main.364, CC BY 4.0)
Made by Peking University and Alibaba Group Released Nov 2025 Knowledge in many languages Tasks kept private Last in a launch post Jun 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
5
Models scored in lab cards
5
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads with 59.1% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 59.1%
  2. 2 Qwen3.7-Max 59%
  3. 3 Qwen3.7-Plus 58.8%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58.6%
  5. 5 Qwen 3.6 Plus 57.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 59.1% Feb 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.7-Max 59% May 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.7-Plus 58.8% Jun 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58.6% Feb 2026 Model card
5 Qwen 3.6 Plus 57.9% Apr 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 58.8 NOVA-63
20 May 2026 Qwen3.7-Max 59 NOVA-63
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 57.9 NOVA-63
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 58.6 NOVA-63
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 59.1 NOVA-63

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%