Benchmark Almanac

MyPCBench

Navigator n2 82.6% tops its leaderboard Claude Opus 4.8 62% leads the models we track Not in model cards

Computer-use agents work in a personalized Linux desktop with 17 simulated logged-in web apps and a user's history, across 184 tasks.

Best reported model at launch was Claude Opus 4.6 at 55.4%.

In the authors’ words

Current benchmarks for computer-use agents evaluate models in impersonal environments. This leaves a gap between evaluation and deployment where personal assistants are expected to work across a user's whole digital life, including their context, historical data, and logged-in accounts. This gap is widest on web tasks, where live web evaluations cannot exercise sites that require logging in or personal information, the kind of site a real personal assistant has to drive. We introduce MyPCBench, which tests computer-use agents as personal assistants on a Linux desktop populated with 17 simulated real-world web applications and a full desktop stack, all seeded for one canonical persona, Michael Scott from The Office. We define 184 tasks in this environment, each inspired by a real request drawn from the OpenClaw community, and benchmark six closed and open-weight models with a uniform computer+bash tool surface. We find that the best model, Claude Opus 4.6, fully solves 55.4% of the tasks, the only model above 50%. Model failures cluster on tasks that span many applications and on long trajectories, where personalization stresses an assistant the most. We release the environment, task set, and agent harness at https://mypcbench.com.

Abstract of MyPCBench: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Computer-Use Agents (arXiv:2606.16748, CC0)
Made by Carnegie Mellon University Released Jun 2026 Desktop apps All tasks public Last model added Jul 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
12
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

Navigator n2 tops the leaderboard with 82.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Opus 4.8, at 62%.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Navigator n2 82.6%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 4.8 62%
  3. 3 Qwen-CUA 58.7%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 4.6 58.2%
  5. 5 GPT-5.6 Luna 55.4%
  6. 6 GPT-5.6 Sol 55.4%
  7. 7 Qwen-3.7 51.6%
  8. 8 Claude Sonnet 4.6 50.5%
  9. 9 GPT-5.5 45.1%
  10. 10 GPT-5.4 Mini 23.9%
  11. 11 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.60%
  12. 12 Qwen3.5-9B 6.50%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Navigator n2 82.6% Computer + bash Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 4.8 62% Computer only May 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen-CUA 58.7% Computer only Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 4.6 58.2% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.6 Luna 55.4% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5.6 Sol 55.4% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen-3.7 51.6% Computer only Official leaderboard
8 Claude Sonnet 4.6 50.5% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.5 45.1% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5.4 Mini 23.9% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.60% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3.5-9B 6.50% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.8

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Computer and browser use

All 56 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%