Benchmark Almanac

MultiLoKo

Llama 3.1-405B 31% leads since Apr 2025 Fading

Locally relevant knowledge questions in 31 languages, plus translations. Scored by exact match.

In the authors’ words

We present MultiLoKo, a new benchmark for evaluating multilinguality in LLMs covering 31 languages. MultiLoKo consists of three partitions: a main partition consisting of 500 questions per language, separately sourced to be locally relevant to the specific language, and two translated partitions, containing human-authored translations from 30 non-English languages to English and vice versa. For comparison, we also release corresponding machine-authored translations. The data is equally distributed over two splits: a dev split and a blind, out-of-distribution test split. MultiLoKo can be used to study a variety of questions regarding the multilinguality of LLMs as well as meta-questions about multilingual benchmark creation. We compute MultiLoKo scores for 11 base and chat models marketed to be multilingual and study their average performance, their performance parity across languages, how much their ability to answer questions depends on the question language, and which languages are most difficult. None of the models we studied performs well on MultiLoKo, as indicated by low average scores as well as large differences between the best and worst scoring languages. Furthermore, we find a substantial effect of the question language, indicating sub-optimal knowledge transfer between languages. Lastly, we find that using local vs English-translated data can result in differences more than 20 points for the best performing models, drastically change the estimated difficulty of some languages. For using machines instead of human translations, we find a weaker effect on ordering of language difficulty, a larger difference in model rankings, and a substantial drop in estimated performance for all models.

Abstract of MultiLoKo: a multilingual local knowledge benchmark for LLMs spanning 31 languages (arXiv:2504.10356, CC0)
Made by Meta FAIR Released Apr 2025 Knowledge in many languages Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Sep 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
7
Models scored on its own leaderboard
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

Llama 3.1-405B leads with 31% among models released by Mar 2025

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Llama 3.1-405B base model 31%
  2. 2 GPT-4o Mar 2025 31%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 30.6%
  4. 4 Llama 3.1-70B base model 24.3%
  5. 5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 23.2%
  6. 6 Mixtral 8x22B base model 19.3%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-72B base model 16.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Llama 3.1-405B 31% base model Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o Mar 2025 31% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 30.6% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Llama 3.1-70B 24.3% base model Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 23.2% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Mixtral 8x22B 19.3% base model Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-72B 16.4% base model Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Llama 3.1-405B
base model
31%
Llama 3.1-70B
base model
24.3%
Mixtral 8x22B
base model
19.3%
Qwen2.5-72B
base model
16.4%
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Llama 3.1-405B base model 31%
GPT-4o Mar 2025 31%
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 30.6%
Llama 3.1-405B 25.1%
Llama 3.1-70B base model 24.3%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet 23.2%
Llama 3.1-70B 19.7%
Mixtral 8x22B base model 19.3%
Qwen2.5-72B base model 16.4%
Mixtral 8x22B 7.99%
Qwen2.5-72B 2.14%

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-V4-Pro Llama 3.1-405B Claude 3.5 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-V4-Pro Llama 3.1-405B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Sep 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.5 MultiLoKo (LLM-Judge)
24 Apr 2026 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.1 MultiLoKo (EM)

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%