MultiLoKo
Locally relevant knowledge questions in 31 languages, plus translations. Scored by exact match.
In the authors’ words
We present MultiLoKo, a new benchmark for evaluating multilinguality in LLMs covering 31 languages. MultiLoKo consists of three partitions: a main partition consisting of 500 questions per language, separately sourced to be locally relevant to the specific language, and two translated partitions, containing human-authored translations from 30 non-English languages to English and vice versa. For comparison, we also release corresponding machine-authored translations. The data is equally distributed over two splits: a dev split and a blind, out-of-distribution test split. MultiLoKo can be used to study a variety of questions regarding the multilinguality of LLMs as well as meta-questions about multilingual benchmark creation. We compute MultiLoKo scores for 11 base and chat models marketed to be multilingual and study their average performance, their performance parity across languages, how much their ability to answer questions depends on the question language, and which languages are most difficult. None of the models we studied performs well on MultiLoKo, as indicated by low average scores as well as large differences between the best and worst scoring languages. Furthermore, we find a substantial effect of the question language, indicating sub-optimal knowledge transfer between languages. Lastly, we find that using local vs English-translated data can result in differences more than 20 points for the best performing models, drastically change the estimated difficulty of some languages. For using machines instead of human translations, we find a weaker effect on ordering of language difficulty, a larger difference in model rankings, and a substantial drop in estimated performance for all models.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Llama 3.1-405B leads with 31% among models released by Mar 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Llama 3.1-405B base model 31%
- 2 GPT-4o Mar 2025 31%
- 3
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 30.6%
- 4
Llama 3.1-70B base model 24.3%
- 5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 23.2%
- 6
Mixtral 8x22B base model 19.3%
- 7
Qwen2.5-72B base model 16.4%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 31% | base model | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 31% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 30.6% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 24.3% | base model | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 23.2% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 19.3% | base model | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 16.4% | base model | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | base model | 31% | |||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 31% | ||||
| | 30.6% | ||||
| | 25.1% | ||||
| | base model | 24.3% | |||
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 23.2% | ||||
| | 19.7% | ||||
| | base model | 19.3% | |||
| | base model | 16.4% | |||
| | 7.99% | ||||
| | 2.14% |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Sep 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2026 | 45.5 | MultiLoKo (LLM-Judge) | |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 51.1 | MultiLoKo (EM) |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Inkling 88.7%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%