Benchmark Almanac

Multi-SWE-bench

MiniMax-M2.7 52.7% leads since Mar 2026 Fading

Agents resolve 1,632 GitHub issues in Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++ repos. Patches must pass the repos' tests.

A 300-instance subset, Multi-SWE-bench flash, followed in July 2025.

In the authors’ words

The task of issue resolving is to modify a codebase to generate a patch that addresses a given issue. However, existing benchmarks, such as SWE-bench, focus almost exclusively on Python, making them insufficient for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse software ecosystems. To address this, we introduce a multilingual issue-resolving benchmark, called Multi-SWE-bench, covering Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++. It includes a total of 1,632 high-quality instances, which were carefully annotated from 2,456 candidates by 68 expert annotators, ensuring that the benchmark can provide an accurate and reliable evaluation. Based on Multi-SWE-bench, we evaluate a series of state-of-the-art models using three representative methods (Agentless, SWE-agent, and OpenHands) and present a comprehensive analysis with key empirical insights. In addition, we launch a Multi-SWE-RL open-source community, aimed at building large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) training datasets for issue-resolving tasks. As an initial contribution, we release a set of 4,723 well-structured instances spanning seven programming languages, laying a solid foundation for RL research in this domain. More importantly, we open-source our entire data production pipeline, along with detailed tutorials, encouraging the open-source community to continuously contribute and expand the dataset. We envision our Multi-SWE-bench and the ever-growing Multi-SWE-RL community as catalysts for advancing RL toward its full potential, bringing us one step closer to the dawn of AGI.

Abstract of Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving (arXiv:2504.02605, CC0)
Made by ByteDance Seed Released Apr 2025 Fixing real repositories All tasks public Last in a launch post Mar 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added May 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
10
Models scored in lab cards
9
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
6
System cards report it, from 3 labs

MiniMax-M2.7 leads with 52.7% among models released by Mar 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 MiniMax-M2.7 52.7%
  2. 2 MiniMax-M2.5 51.3%
  3. 3 MiniMax-M2.1 49.4%
  4. 4 Seed2.0 Pro 45.2%
  5. 5 Seed1.8 42%
  6. 6 Kimi K2 Thinking 41.9%
  7. 7 MiniMax-M2 36.2%
  8. 8 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 33.5%
  9. 9 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 18.3%
  10. 10 seed-oss-36b-instruct 17%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M2.7 52.7% Mar 2026 Model card
2 MiniMax-M2.5 51.3% Feb 2026 Model card
3 MiniMax-M2.1 49.4% Dec 2025 Model card
4 Seed2.0 Pro 45.2% Feb 2026 Model card
5 Seed1.8 42% Dec 2025 Model card
6 Kimi K2 Thinking 41.9% Nov 2025 Model card
7 MiniMax-M2 36.2% Oct 2025 Model card
8 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 33.5% Sep 2025 Model card
9 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 18.3% Jul 2025 Model card
10 seed-oss-36b-instruct 17% Aug 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 12 entries, 11 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Moonshot AI MiniMax ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025
Lab claims Not tested since May 2026
MiniMax-M2.7 52.7%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.7 Seed1.8 MiniMax-M2 Kimi K2 Gemini 2.5 Pro Claude 3.7 Sonnet Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.7 Seed1.8

Labs headline it less often now, last in Mar 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Moonshot AI
MiniMax
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Mar 2026 MiniMax-M2.7 52.7 Multi-SWE Bench
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 45.2 Multi-SWE-Bench
12 Feb 2026 MiniMax-M2.5 51.3 Multi-SWE-Bench
23 Dec 2025 MiniMax-M2.1 49.4 Multi-SWE-bench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 42 Multi-SWE-Bench
6 Nov 2025 Kimi K2 Thinking 41.9 Multi-SWE-bench, w/ tools
27 Oct 2025 MiniMax-M2 36.2 Multi-SWE-Bench
5 Sep 2025 Kimi K2 33.5 Multi-SWE-Bench, ACC
20 Aug 2025 seed-oss-36b-instruct 17 Multi-SWE-Bench

6 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
26 May 2026 MiniMax-M2 technical report 36.2 Multi-SWE-bench, MiniMax-M2 bar, printed label (Figure 9) Capabilities
26 May 2026 MiniMax-M2.7 technical report 52.7 Multi-SWE-bench, Claude Code scaffold, avg of 4 trials (Table 4) Capabilities
26 May 2026 MiniMax-M2.5 technical report 51.3 Multi-SWE-bench, Claude Code scaffold, avg of 4 trials (Table 4) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 42 Multi-SWE-Bench (Table 4) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 45.2 Multi-SWE-Bench (Table 11) Capabilities
21 Jul 2025 Kimi K2 technical report 18.3 Multi-SWE-bench (Pass@1) (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471