Benchmark Almanac

Multi-factual (Anthropic)

Claude 3 Opus 62.8% Only in system cards

Models answer questions that each combine several closed-ended sub-questions on one topic. Answers are graded correct, incorrect or unsure against references.

In-house Anthropic factuality evaluation. Questions were built from article quotes and checked by hand. Score is the share answered correctly.

Made by Anthropic Released Mar 2024 Long-form factuality Tasks kept private Last in a system card Mar 2024 Last model added Mar 2024
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
1
Model scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude 3 Opus leads with 62.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Claude 3 Opus 62.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3 Opus 62.8% Mar 2024 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
4 Mar 2024 Claude 3 Sonnet model card Multi-factual, correct, incorrect and unsure shares, chart without printed values (Figure 11) Hallucination
4 Mar 2024 Claude 3 Opus model card 62.8 Multi-factual, % correct ("over 62.8%"), stated in text. Incorrect and unsure shares in a chart without printed values (5.7, Figure 11) Hallucination
4 Mar 2024 Claude 3 Haiku model card Multi-factual, correct, incorrect and unsure shares, chart without printed values (Figure 11) Hallucination

More in Factuality

All 70 in Factuality
  • SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references. Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
  • HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy. Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
  • SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge. Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
  • GaRAGe In use Models write long-form RAG answers to 2,366 questions with human-annotated grounding passages. Scoring checks whether answers use the relevant passages. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 40.7%
  • Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. Kimi K3.1 Pro 8.30%
  • RAGTruth In use A word-level annotated corpus of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation answers. It is used to train and evaluate hallucination detection and RAG faithfulness. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 77.9%