MMLU-CF
Models answer new MMLU-style multiple-choice questions written to avoid training data contamination. A 10,000 question test set stays private.
Only the 10,000 question validation set is public. The makers score the test set on request through GitHub issues. OpenCompass supports it. ACL 2025.
In the authors’ words
Multiple-choice question (MCQ) datasets like Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) are widely used to evaluate the commonsense, understanding, and problem-solving abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the open-source nature of these benchmarks and the broad sources of training data for LLMs have inevitably led to benchmark contamination, resulting in unreliable evaluation results. To alleviate this issue, we propose a contamination-free and more challenging MCQ benchmark called MMLU-CF. This benchmark reassesses LLMs' understanding of world knowledge by averting both unintentional and malicious data leakage. To avoid unintentional data leakage, we source data from a broader domain and design three decontamination rules. To prevent malicious data leakage, we divide the benchmark into validation and test sets with similar difficulty and subject distributions. The test set remains closed-source to ensure reliable results, while the validation set is publicly available to promote transparency and facilitate independent verification. Our evaluation of mainstream LLMs reveals that the powerful GPT-4o achieves merely a 5-shot score of 73.4% and a 0-shot score of 71.9% on the test set, which indicates the effectiveness of our approach in creating a more rigorous and contamination-free evaluation standard. The GitHub repository is available at https://github.com/microsoft/MMLU-CF and the dataset refers to https://huggingface.co/datasets/microsoft/MMLU-CF.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
GPT-4o leads with 73.4% among models released by Dec 2024
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Dec 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 73.4 GPT-4o
- 71.6
Qwen2.5-72B
- 70.4 GPT-4 Turbo
- 69.7
Qwen2.5-32B
- 68.9
Llama 3-70B
- 68.8
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 68.7
Llama 3.1-70B
- 67.8
Phi-4
- 66.4
Qwen2.5-14B
- 65.5 GPT-4o mini
- 64.8
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 64.6
Phi-3.5-MoE
- 64.2 Phi-3-medium-instruct
- 63.9
Gemma 2 27B
- 63.7
Qwen2-72B
- 62.8
Mixtral 8x22B
- 61.3
Yi-1.5-34B
- 61.3
Qwen2.5-7B
- 59.8
Qwen1.5-72B
- 58.3
Mixtral 8x7B
- 58.2 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 58.1
Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- 57.9
Phi-3.5-mini
- 57.9 Phi-3-mini-instruct (3.8B)
- 57.8 GLM-4-9B-Chat
- 57.3
Llama 3-8B
- 57.3 Internlm-2.5-7B-chat
- 57.1
Llama 3.1-8B
- 55.9
Qwen2.5-3B
- 53.7
Gemma 2 9B
- 52.8
Yi-1.5-6B-Chat
- 52.2
Llama 2-70B
- 51.2
Qwen2.5-1.5B
- 50.7
Mistral 7B v0.3
- 49.3 Deepseek-v2-lite-chat
- 48.3 Baichuan2-13B-Chat
- 47.1
Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct
- 44.5 Baichuan-2-7B-chat
- 43.9 Gemma-2-2B
- 42.8
Llama 2-13B
- 41.9
Qwen2.5-0.5B
- 40.5 Internlm-2-chat-1.8b
- 39.4
Llama 2-7B
- 38.3
Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct
- 1 GPT-4o Nov 2024 73.4%
- 2
Qwen2.5-72B 71.6%
- 3 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 70.4%
- 4
Qwen2.5-32B 69.7%
- 5
Llama 3-70B 68.9%
- 6
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 68.8%
- 7
Llama 3.1-70B 68.7%
- 8
Phi-4 67.8%
- 9
Qwen2.5-14B 66.4%
- 10 GPT-4o mini 65.5%
- 11
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 64.8%
- 12
Phi-3.5-MoE 64.6%
- 13 Phi-3-medium-instruct 64.2%
- 14
Gemma 2 27B 63.9%
- 15
Qwen2-72B 63.7%
- 16
Mixtral 8x22B 62.8%
- 17
Yi-1.5-34B 61.3%
- 18
Qwen2.5-7B 61.3%
- 19
Qwen1.5-72B 59.8%
- 20
Mixtral 8x7B 58.3%
- 21 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 58.2%
- 22
Qwen2-7B-Instruct 58.1%
- 23
Phi-3.5-mini 57.9%
- 24 Phi-3-mini-instruct (3.8B) 57.9%
- 25 GLM-4-9B-Chat 57.8%
- 26
Llama 3-8B 57.3%
- 27 Internlm-2.5-7B-chat 57.3%
- 28
Llama 3.1-8B 57.1%
- 29
Qwen2.5-3B 55.9%
- 30
Gemma 2 9B 53.7%
- 31
Yi-1.5-6B-Chat 52.8%
- 32
Llama 2-70B 52.2%
- 33
Qwen2.5-1.5B 51.2%
- 34
Mistral 7B v0.3 50.7%
- 35 Deepseek-v2-lite-chat 49.3%
- 36 Baichuan2-13B-Chat 48.3%
- 37
Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct 47.1%
- 38 Baichuan-2-7B-chat 44.5%
- 39 Gemma-2-2B 43.9%
- 40
Llama 2-13B 42.8%
- 41
Qwen2.5-0.5B 41.9%
- 42 Internlm-2-chat-1.8b 40.5%
- 43
Llama 2-7B 39.4%
- 44
Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct 38.3%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 73.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 71.6% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 70.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 69.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 68.9% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 68.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 68.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 67.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 66.4% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-4o mini | 65.5% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 64.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 64.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Phi-3-medium-instruct | 64.2% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 63.9% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 63.7% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 62.8% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 61.3% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 61.3% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 59.8% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 58.3% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 58.2% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 58.1% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 57.9% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Phi-3-mini-instruct (3.8B) | 57.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GLM-4-9B-Chat | 57.8% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 57.3% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | Internlm-2.5-7B-chat | 57.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 57.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 55.9% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 53.7% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 52.8% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 52.2% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 51.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 50.7% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | Deepseek-v2-lite-chat | 49.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Baichuan2-13B-Chat | 48.3% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 47.1% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | Baichuan-2-7B-chat | 44.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | Gemma-2-2B | 43.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 42.8% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 41.9% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Internlm-2-chat-1.8b | 40.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 39.4% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 38.3% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- BIG-Bench Extra Hard In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is a harmonic mean of task accuracies.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%