MILU
Multi-task Indic Language Understanding: culturally grounded multiple-choice questions in 11 Indic languages.
In the authors’ words
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in low-resource and linguistically diverse languages remains a significant challenge in NLP, particularly for languages using non-Latin scripts like those spoken in India. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on English, leaving substantial gaps in assessing LLM capabilities in these languages. We introduce MILU, a Multi task Indic Language Understanding Benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark designed to address this gap. MILU spans 8 domains and 41 subjects across 11 Indic languages, reflecting both general and culturally specific knowledge. With an India-centric design, incorporates material from regional and state-level examinations, covering topics such as local history, arts, festivals, and laws, alongside standard subjects like science and mathematics. We evaluate over 42 LLMs, and find that current LLMs struggle with MILU, with GPT-4o achieving the highest average accuracy at 74 percent. Open multilingual models outperform language-specific fine-tuned models, which perform only slightly better than random baselines. Models also perform better in high resource languages as compared to low resource ones. Domain-wise analysis indicates that models perform poorly in culturally relevant areas like Arts and Humanities, Law and Governance compared to general fields like STEM. To the best of our knowledge, MILU is the first of its kind benchmark focused on Indic languages, serving as a crucial step towards comprehensive cultural evaluation. All code, benchmarks, and artifacts are publicly available to foster open research.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 93.1%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 Claude Opus 5.5 93.1%
- 2 Claude Fable 5.1 93%
- 3 Claude Opus 5 92.1%
- 4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 91.6%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.8 90.3%
- 6 Claude Opus 4.7 89.9%
- 7 Claude Sonnet 4.6 89.6%
- 8 Claude Sonnet 5 89.3%
- 9 Claude Haiku 5.5 87.6%
- 10 Sarvam-M 75%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 93.1% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 93% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5 | 92.1% | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 91.6% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 90.3% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 89.9% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 89.6% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 8 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 89.3% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 9 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 87.6% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | Sarvam-M | 75% | May 2025 | Model card |
7 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Feb 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No launch post has listed it since May 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 May 2025 | Sarvam-M | 75 | MILU-IN, Indic queries only (0.75) |
9 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 87.6 | MILU, average accuracy across 11 languages, max effort (8.12.2) | Capabilities |
| 28 Sep 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 91.6 | MILU average accuracy across 11 languages, max effort (8.16.2, Figure 8.16.2.A) | Capabilities |
| 22 Sep 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 93.1 | MILU average accuracy across 11 languages, max effort, five trials (8.16.2, Figure 8.16.2.A) | Capabilities |
| 1 Sep 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 93 | MILU average accuracy over 11 languages, max effort, 5 trials (8.18.2) | Capabilities |
| 24 Jul 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 92.1 | MILU average accuracy across 11 languages, max effort, five trials, printed on chart (8.16.2, Figure 8.16.2.A) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jun 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 89.3 | MILU average accuracy across 11 languages, max effort, five trials (8.13.2, Figure 8.13.2.A) | Capabilities |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 90.3 | MILU average accuracy across 11 languages, adaptive thinking (8.15.2, Figure 8.15.2.A) | Capabilities |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 89.9 | MILU average accuracy over English and 10 Indic languages, adaptive thinking (8.12.2, Figure 8.12.2.A) | Capabilities |
| 17 Feb 2026 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card | 89.6 | MILU average over English and 10 Indic languages, adaptive thinking, max effort (Table 2.19.2.A) | Capabilities |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Inkling 88.7%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%