Benchmark Almanac

MEWC v2

MiniMax-M2.7 63.3% Only in system cards

Models solve 100 hard Microsoft Excel World Championship problems with Excel tools. Expert rubrics score the answers over three trials.

In-house MiniMax evaluation. It is a hard subset of the MEWC pool, so scores differ from the 179-problem MEWC.

Made by MiniMax Released May 2026 Documents and spreadsheets Tasks kept private Last in a system card May 2026 Last model added May 2026
Level
Competition The strongest students, in olympiad-style contests
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

MiniMax-M2.7 leads with 63.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 MiniMax-M2.7 63.3%
  2. 2 MiniMax-M2.5 49.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M2.7 63.3% May 2026 Model card
2 MiniMax-M2.5 49.8% May 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.7 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.7

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
26 May 2026 MiniMax-M2.7 technical report 63.3 MEWC v2 (Table 4) Capabilities
26 May 2026 MiniMax-M2.5 technical report 49.8 MEWC v2 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Economic work

All 91 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%