MAWPS
Models solve one-unknown arithmetic and algebra word problems drawn from several earlier collections. Each problem has an equation and a numeric answer, and the final answer is scored by exact match.
Saturated for current models. SVAMP showed that solvers can score well on MAWPS without reading the question. Google's chain-of-thought paper (Wei et al. 2022) used it with GSM8K and SVAMP. 41 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- University of Washington and collaborators (Koncel-Kedziorski, Roy, Amini, Kushman, Hajishirzi)
- Released
- June 2016
- Kind
- Word problems
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for MAWPS yet.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Math
- AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
- IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
- HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
- PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked.
Qwen3.7-Max 86.5% - MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
- MathArena Apex Shortlist In use Models solve 47 hard final-answer problems that MathArena selected from 2025 competitions, where the best models scored about 50% at selection. Scored by accuracy over repeated attempts. GPT-5.5 98.4%