Benchmark Almanac

LOFT

Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 87% leads since Jul 2025 Dropped

Models solve retrieval, RAG, SQL, and many-shot learning tasks with whole corpora of up to one million tokens in context. Scored per task.

In the authors’ words

Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. Leveraging LCLMs' ability to natively ingest and process entire corpora of information offers numerous advantages. It enhances user-friendliness by eliminating the need for specialized knowledge of tools, provides robust end-to-end modeling that minimizes cascading errors in complex pipelines, and allows for the application of sophisticated prompting techniques across the entire system. To assess this paradigm shift, we introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks. However, LCLMs still face challenges in areas like compositional reasoning that are required in SQL-like tasks. Notably, prompting strategies significantly influence performance, emphasizing the need for continued research as context lengths grow. Overall, LOFT provides a rigorous testing ground for LCLMs, showcasing their potential to supplant existing paradigms and tackle novel tasks as model capabilities scale.

Abstract of Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? (arXiv:2406.13121, CC0)
Made by Google DeepMind Released Jun 2024 Finding facts in long inputs All tasks public Last in a launch post Feb 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jul 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
6
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 87% among models released by Apr 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 87%
  2. 2 Grok 3 83.3%
  3. 3 Grok-3 mini 83.1%
  4. 4 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 82.1%
  5. 5 Gemma 4 31B IT 79.5%
  6. 6 Gemma 4 26B A4B 66.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 87% Jul 2025 Model card
2 Grok 3 83.3% Feb 2025 Model card
3 Grok-3 mini 83.1% Feb 2025 Model card
4 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 82.1% Jul 2025 Model card
5 Gemma 4 31B IT 79.5% Jul 2026 Model card
6 Gemma 4 26B A4B 66.3% Jul 2026 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

xAI Google DeepMind
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jul 2025, by Gemini 2.5 Pro

The best score passed 85% in Jul 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 2.5 Pro

No launch post has listed it since Feb 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

xAI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
19 Feb 2025 Grok-3 mini 83.1 LOFT (128k) [Grok 3 mini, non-reasoning table]
19 Feb 2025 Grok 3 83.3 LOFT (128k) [Grok 3 Beta, avg of 12 tasks]

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
24 Jul 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT technical report 79.5 LOFT Text Retrieval, Recall@k, 128k, without thinking (Table 9) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B technical report 66.3 LOFT Text Retrieval, Recall@k, 128k, without thinking (Table 9) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 87 LOFT (hard retrieval), <=128K (Table 3); 1M pointwise = 69.8% Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 82.1 LOFT (hard retrieval), <=128K (Table 3); 1M pointwise = 58.9% Capabilities

More in Long context

All 66 in Long context
  • MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
  • LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy. Beam 1.0 66.9%
  • GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 100%
  • OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin. K-EXAONE 2.0 94.4%
  • CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
  • AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key. Step 5 Preview 88.3%