Benchmark Almanac

KoBALT

K-EXAONE 61.8% leads since Dec 2025 Fading

Models answer 700 expert-written multiple-choice questions on 24 Korean linguistic phenomena in syntax, semantics, pragmatics, phonology and morphology.

Questions have little n-gram overlap with standard Korean corpora, to limit contamination.

In the authors’ words

We introduce KoBALT (Korean Benchmark for Advanced Linguistic Tasks), a comprehensive linguistically-motivated benchmark comprising 700 multiple-choice questions spanning 24 phenomena across five linguistic domains: syntax, semantics, pragmatics, phonetics/phonology, and morphology. KoBALT is designed to advance the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in Korean, a morphologically rich language, by addressing the limitations of conventional benchmarks that often lack linguistic depth and typological grounding. It introduces a suite of expert-curated, linguistically motivated questions with minimal n-gram overlap with standard Korean corpora, substantially mitigating the risk of data contamination and allowing a more robust assessment of true language understanding. Our evaluation of 20 contemporary LLMs reveals significant performance disparities, with the highest-performing model achieving 61% general accuracy but showing substantial variation across linguistic domains - from stronger performance in semantics (66%) to considerable weaknesses in phonology (31%) and morphology (36%). Through human preference evaluation with 95 annotators, we demonstrate a strong correlation between KoBALT scores and human judgments, validating our benchmark's effectiveness as a discriminative measure of Korean language understanding. KoBALT addresses critical gaps in linguistic evaluation for typologically diverse languages and provides a robust framework for assessing genuine linguistic competence in Korean language models.

Abstract of KoBALT: Korean Benchmark For Advanced Linguistic Tasks (arXiv:2505.16125, CC0)
Made by Seoul National University and collaborators (Hyopil Shin et al.) Released May 2025 Reasoning in many languages All tasks public Last in a launch post Apr 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Apr 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

K-EXAONE leads with 61.8% among models released by Apr 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 K-EXAONE 61.8%
  2. 2 EXAONE 4.5 33B 52.1%
  3. 3 Solar Open 100B 44.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 K-EXAONE 61.8% Dec 2025 Model card
2 EXAONE 4.5 33B 52.1% Apr 2026 Model card
3 Solar Open 100B 44.3% Dec 2025 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

LG AI Research
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2026
K-EXAONE 61.8%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) K-EXAONE 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) K-EXAONE

Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

LG AI Research
Upstage
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 52.1 KoBALT
31 Dec 2025 Solar Open 100B 44.3 KoBALT
31 Dec 2025 K-EXAONE 61.8 KoBALT

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 52.1 KoBALT (Table 3, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
11 Jan 2026 Solar Open 100B technical report 44.3 KoBALT (Table 5) Capabilities
5 Jan 2026 K-EXAONE technical report 61.8 KoBALT (Table 3, Reasoning mode). Non-reasoning 49.1 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%