Investment Banking Modeling Tasks (OpenAI)
Models build first- to third-year investment banking analyst models, such as three-statement and leveraged buyout models, with formatting and citations. OpenAI grades the outputs internally.
OpenAI first reported it for ChatGPT agent on 2025-07-17, as first- to third-year analyst modeling tasks such as three-statement and leveraged buyout models. The GPT-5.2 post called it Investment banking spreadsheet tasks, with GPT-5.2 at 68.4 under both names. The grading method is not described, so model-judged is assumed.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
GPT-5.5 Pro leads with 88.6% among models released by Apr 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 14 more
- 1 GPT-5.5 Pro 88.6%
- 2 GPT-5.4 Pro 83.6%
- 3 GPT-5.2 Pro 71.7%
- 4 ChatGPT agent 41%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.5 Pro | 88.6% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | GPT-5.4 Pro | 83.6% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.2 Pro | 71.7% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | ChatGPT agent | 41% | Jul 2025 | Model card |
4 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Apr 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Apr 2026 | GPT-5.5 Pro | 88.6 | Investment Banking Modeling Tasks (Internal) |
| 5 Mar 2026 | GPT-5.4 Pro | 83.6 | Investment Banking Modeling Tasks (Internal) |
| 11 Dec 2025 | GPT-5.2 Pro | 71.7 | Investment banking spreadsheet tasks (internal) |
| 17 Jul 2025 | ChatGPT agent | 41 | Investment Banking Modeling Tasks, mean accuracy (Oracle@64 71.3) |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4% - HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5% - KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%