Benchmark Almanac

IndicGenBench

Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 77.1 leads since Jun 2025 Dropped

Models summarize, translate, and answer questions across 29 Indic languages using human-translated versions of CrossSum, FLORES, XQuAD, and XorQA. Each task uses its standard metric.

Google DeepMind runs it as a Kaggle benchmark (published 2025-12-04, 14 models). It covers 29 Indic languages.

In the authors’ words

As large language models (LLMs) see increasing adoption across the globe, it is imperative for LLMs to be representative of the linguistic diversity of the world. India is a linguistically diverse country of 1.4 Billion people. To facilitate research on multilingual LLM evaluation, we release IndicGenBench - the largest benchmark for evaluating LLMs on user-facing generation tasks across a diverse set 29 of Indic languages covering 13 scripts and 4 language families. IndicGenBench is composed of diverse generation tasks like cross-lingual summarization, machine translation, and cross-lingual question answering. IndicGenBench extends existing benchmarks to many Indic languages through human curation providing multi-way parallel evaluation data for many under-represented Indic languages for the first time. We evaluate a wide range of proprietary and open-source LLMs including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, PaLM-2, mT5, Gemma, BLOOM and LLaMA on IndicGenBench in a variety of settings. The largest PaLM-2 models performs the best on most tasks, however, there is a significant performance gap in all languages compared to English showing that further research is needed for the development of more inclusive multilingual language models. IndicGenBench is released at www.github.com/google-research-datasets/indic-gen-bench

Abstract of IndicGenBench: A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Generation Capabilities of LLMs on Indic Languages (arXiv:2404.16816, CC0)
Made by Google Research Released Apr 2024 Reading in many languages All tasks public Last in a launch post May 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Nov 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
14
Entries on its own leaderboard, 13 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 77.1 among models released by Nov 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Nov 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 77.1
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 4.5 60.6
  3. 3 Gemini 3 Pro 59.9
  4. 4 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 56.9
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.1 55.0
  6. 6 GPT-5 52.2
  7. 7 Grok 4 52.0
  8. 8 o3 50.0
  9. 9 Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506 48.9
  10. 10 GPT-4.1 43.7
  11. 11 o4-mini 41.9
  12. 12 gpt-oss-120b 39.1
  13. 13 Sarvam-M 37.2
  14. 14 gpt-oss-20b 34.5
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 77.1 Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Sonnet 4.5 60.6 Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3 Pro 59.9 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 56.9 Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.1 55.0 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5 52.2 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Grok 4 52.0 Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
8 o3 50.0 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506 48.9 Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-4.1 43.7 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 o4-mini 41.9 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 gpt-oss-120b 39.1 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Sarvam-M 37.2 May 2025 Official leaderboard
14 gpt-oss-20b 34.5 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

3 models have held number one since its release in Apr 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2025
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 2025 2026 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 2025 2026

No launch post has listed it since May 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Sarvam AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
23 May 2025 Sarvam-M 49 IndicGenBench (0.49)
12 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B 63.4 IndicGenBench (PT)

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 57.2 IndicGenBench (IndicGB) average, chrF, PT (Table 13, detail in Table 14) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 63.4 IndicGenBench (IndicGB) average, chrF, PT (Table 13, detail in Table 14) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 1B technical report 41.4 IndicGenBench (IndicGB) average, chrF, PT (Table 13, detail in Table 14) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 61.7 IndicGenBench (IndicGB) average, chrF, PT (Table 13, detail in Table 14) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%