Benchmark Almanac

FrontierCode

Claude Opus 4.8 34.3% leads since Jun 2026 In use

Real-repo coding tasks graded for mergeability: correctness, regressions, lint, tests, scope and code quality. Failing any blocker scores zero.

Tasks written by 20+ open-source maintainers, 40+ hours each. Only sample tasks are public.

Made by Cognition Released Jun 2026 Fixing real repositories Tasks kept private Last in a launch post Sep 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
12
Models scored on its own leaderboard
4
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 4.8 leads with 34.3% among models released by May 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.8 xhigh 34.3%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 xhigh 25.5%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh 23%
  4. 4 GPT-5.4 Mini xhigh 17.8%
  5. 5 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 16.7%
  6. 6 Kimi K2.6 none 16%
  7. 7 Claude Sonnet 4.6 high 15.1%
  8. 8 Kimi K2.5 none 6.86%
  9. 9 MiniMax-M2.7 none 5.98%
  10. 10 SWE-1.6 none 5.50%
  11. 11 MiniMax-M2.5 none 5.34%
  12. 12 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite low 4.84%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.8 34.3% xhigh, Claude Code May 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.5 25.5% xhigh, Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.7 23% xhigh, Claude Code Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.4 Mini 17.8% xhigh, Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 16.7% high, Gemini CLI Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Kimi K2.6 16% none, mini-swe-agent Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Sonnet 4.6 15.1% high, Claude Code Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Kimi K2.5 6.86% none, mini-swe-agent Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
9 MiniMax-M2.7 5.98% none, mini-swe-agent Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
10 SWE-1.6 5.50% none, Devin Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
11 MiniMax-M2.5 5.34% none, mini-swe-agent Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 4.84% low, Gemini CLI Mar 2026 Official leaderboard

Epoch AI has scores for 46 models. Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

The best score, 34.3%, costs $6.69 a task

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Google DeepMind OpenAI Anthropic Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% $0.10 $0.20 $0.50 $1.00 $2.00 $5.00 $10 Cost per task, log scale Claude Opus 4.8, xhigh Claude Opus 4.8, high Claude Opus 4.8, medium Claude Opus 4.8, low GPT-5.5, low GPT-5.4 Mini, high Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, low 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% $0.10 $1.00 $10 Cost per task, log scale Claude Opus 4.8, xhigh Claude Opus 4.8, high
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 xhigh Claude Code 34.3% $6.69 62,445
Claude Opus 4.8 max Claude Code 31.3% $9.03 88,169
Claude Opus 4.8 high Claude Code 30.3% $3.94 37,280
Claude Opus 4.8 medium Claude Code 26.9% $3.30 31,701
GPT-5.5 xhigh Codex 25.5% $5.59 25,576
GPT-5.5 high Codex 25.3% $4.38 19,002
Claude Opus 4.8 low Claude Code 25.3% $2.68 23,239
Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh Claude Code 23% $5.93 35,077
GPT-5.5 medium Codex 22.4% $3.29 13,912
Claude Opus 4.7 high Claude Code 22.1% $4.43 28,180
Claude Opus 4.7 medium Claude Code 21.3% $2.85 20,017
GPT-5.5 low Codex 21.1% $1.61 8,482
Claude Opus 4.7 low Claude Code 17.9% $2.43 16,932
GPT-5.4 Mini xhigh Codex 17.8% $1.67 88,550
Gemini 3.1 Pro high Gemini CLI 16.7% $2.41 18,997
Gemini 3.1 Pro low Gemini CLI 16.5% $2.52 19,651
Kimi K2.6 none mini-swe-agent 16% 41,815
Claude Sonnet 4.6 high Claude Code 15.1% $2.40 34,334
Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Claude Code 13.6% $2.09 28,176
Claude Sonnet 4.6 xhigh Claude Code 13.4% $2.48 34,856
Claude Sonnet 4.6 max Claude Code 13.2% $2.57 38,004
GPT-5.4 Mini high Codex 12.4% $1.05 45,131
GPT-5.4 Mini medium Codex 12.1% $0.89 34,720
Kimi K2.5 none mini-swe-agent 6.86% $2.55 19,108
MiniMax-M2.7 none mini-swe-agent 5.98% 30,587
SWE-1.6 none Devin 5.50%
MiniMax-M2.5 none mini-swe-agent 5.34% 21,691
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite low Gemini CLI 4.84% $0.17 13,559
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite high Gemini CLI 4.44% $0.18 14,679
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite minimal Gemini CLI 2.51% $0.37 11,463
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite medium Gemini CLI 1.84% $0.26 10,006

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard, Epoch AI’s runs and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Replaced by 1.1, Jul 2026
Epoch AI runs 3 leaders
Lab claims 4 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Run or collected by Epoch AI Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.7 GPT-5.4 Mini Kimi K2.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 4.8

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 54.4 Agentic coding FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 53.4 Agentic coding FrontierCode v1.1, Main
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 38.8 FrontierCode v1
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 29.3 Agentic coding FrontierCode (Diamond) (xhigh)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 38.8 FrontierCode v1, 150 tasks, max effort (xhigh 34.0%, high 28.9%) (Table 8.1.A, Figure 8.4.A) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 29.3 FrontierCode (Diamond subset), score at xhigh effort, mean@5, 150-task benchmark by Cognition; pass rate 30.2%; Main subset score 46.3% and pass rate 48.8% (Table 8.1.A, 8.4) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Anthropic xAI OpenAI
FrontierCode 2.0 7 leaders
FrontierCode 3 leaders
FrontierCode 1.1 3 leaders
GPT-6 Astra 64.5%

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471