Finance Modeling Pro
MiniMax-M2.7 57% Only in system cards Agents complete financial modeling tasks in Excel. Expert rubrics score each task over three trials.
In-house MiniMax evaluation. Scores differ from the earlier Finance Modeling set reported for M2.5.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
MiniMax-M2.7 leads with 57%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 MiniMax-M2.7 57%
- 2 MiniMax-M2.5 33.8%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MiniMax-M2.7 | 57% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | MiniMax-M2.5 | 33.8% | May 2026 | Model card |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 May 2026 | MiniMax-M2.7 technical report | 57 | Finance Modeling Pro (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 26 May 2026 | MiniMax-M2.5 technical report | 33.8 | Finance Modeling Pro (Table 4) | Capabilities |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4% - HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5% - KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%