FailureSensorIQ
Models answer multiple-choice questions on how industrial sensors relate to failure modes of assets. The Kaggle board shows it under IBM's AssetOpsBench citation.
25 models on the Kaggle board published 2025-12-01.
In the authors’ words
We introduce FailureSensorIQ, a novel Multi-Choice Question-Answering (MCQA) benchmarking system designed to assess the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason and understand complex, domain-specific scenarios in Industry 4.0. Unlike traditional QA benchmarks, our system focuses on multiple aspects of reasoning through failure modes, sensor data, and the relationships between them across various industrial assets. Through this work, we envision a paradigm shift where modeling decisions are not only data-driven using statistical tools like correlation analysis and significance tests, but also domain-driven by specialized LLMs which can reason about the key contributors and useful patterns that can be captured with feature engineering. We evaluate the Industrial knowledge of over a dozen LLMs-including GPT-4, Llama, and Mistral-on FailureSensorIQ from different lens using Perturbation-Uncertainty-Complexity analysis, Expert Evaluation study, Asset-Specific Knowledge Gap analysis, ReAct agent using external knowledge-bases. Even though closed-source models with strong reasoning capabilities approach expert-level performance, the comprehensive benchmark reveals a significant drop in performance that is fragile to perturbations, distractions, and inherent knowledge gaps in the models. We also provide a real-world case study of how LLMs can drive the modeling decisions on 3 different failure prediction datasets related to various assets. We release: (a) expert-curated MCQA for various industrial assets, (b) FailureSensorIQ benchmark and Hugging Face leaderboard based on MCQA built from non-textual data found in ISO documents, and (c) LLMFeatureSelector, an LLM-based feature selection scikit-learn pipeline. The software is available at https://github.com/IBM/FailureSensorIQ.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
GPT-6 Astra leads with 69.5%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 69.5 GPT-6 Astra
- 69.1
Gemini 3 Pro
- 69.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 67.6 o3
- 67.4 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 67.2 GPT-5
- 67.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 66.7 Claude Opus 4.5
- 65.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 65.3 GPT-5 mini
- 64.8 o4-mini
- 64.6 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 64.2 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 64.1 Grok 4 Fast
- 62.9 GPT-5.1
- 61.8 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 60.8 Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506
- 58.6 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 57.6 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 55.8
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 50.5 gpt-oss-120b
- 47.9
Mistral Small 3.1
- 43.5 gpt-oss-20b
- 36.6
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 29.1
DeepSeek-R1
- 1 GPT-6 Astra 69.5%
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro 69.1%
- 3
Gemini 3.8 Flash 69%
- 4 o3 67.6%
- 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 67.4%
- 6 GPT-5 67.2%
- 7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 67%
- 8 Claude Opus 4.5 66.7%
- 9
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 65.5%
- 10 GPT-5 mini 65.3%
- 11 o4-mini 64.8%
- 12 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 64.6%
- 13 Claude Sonnet 4.5 64.2%
- 14 Grok 4 Fast reasoning 64.1%
- 15 GPT-5.1 62.9%
- 16 Claude Haiku 4.5 61.8%
- 17 Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506 60.8%
- 18 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 58.6%
- 19 Claude 3.5 Haiku 57.6%
- 20
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.8%
- 21 gpt-oss-120b 50.5%
- 22
Mistral Small 3.1 47.9%
- 23 gpt-oss-20b 43.5%
- 24
DeepSeek-V3.1 36.6%
- 25
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 29.1%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 69.5% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 69.1% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 69% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | o3 | 67.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 67.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-5 | 67.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 67% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 66.7% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 65.5% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-5 mini | 65.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | o4-mini | 64.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 64.6% | reasoning | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 64.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Grok 4 Fast | 64.1% | reasoning | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5.1 | 62.9% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 61.8% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506 | 60.8% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 58.6% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 57.6% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 55.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | gpt-oss-120b | 50.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 47.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | gpt-oss-20b | 43.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 36.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 29.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%