Benchmark Almanac

FailureSensorIQ

GPT-6 Astra 69.5% leads since Sep 2026 Not in model cards

Models answer multiple-choice questions on how industrial sensors relate to failure modes of assets. The Kaggle board shows it under IBM's AssetOpsBench citation.

25 models on the Kaggle board published 2025-12-01.

In the authors’ words

We introduce FailureSensorIQ, a novel Multi-Choice Question-Answering (MCQA) benchmarking system designed to assess the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason and understand complex, domain-specific scenarios in Industry 4.0. Unlike traditional QA benchmarks, our system focuses on multiple aspects of reasoning through failure modes, sensor data, and the relationships between them across various industrial assets. Through this work, we envision a paradigm shift where modeling decisions are not only data-driven using statistical tools like correlation analysis and significance tests, but also domain-driven by specialized LLMs which can reason about the key contributors and useful patterns that can be captured with feature engineering. We evaluate the Industrial knowledge of over a dozen LLMs-including GPT-4, Llama, and Mistral-on FailureSensorIQ from different lens using Perturbation-Uncertainty-Complexity analysis, Expert Evaluation study, Asset-Specific Knowledge Gap analysis, ReAct agent using external knowledge-bases. Even though closed-source models with strong reasoning capabilities approach expert-level performance, the comprehensive benchmark reveals a significant drop in performance that is fragile to perturbations, distractions, and inherent knowledge gaps in the models. We also provide a real-world case study of how LLMs can drive the modeling decisions on 3 different failure prediction datasets related to various assets. We release: (a) expert-curated MCQA for various industrial assets, (b) FailureSensorIQ benchmark and Hugging Face leaderboard based on MCQA built from non-textual data found in ISO documents, and (c) LLMFeatureSelector, an LLM-based feature selection scikit-learn pipeline. The software is available at https://github.com/IBM/FailureSensorIQ.

Abstract of FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure Modes (arXiv:2506.03278, CC0)
Made by IBM Research Released Jun 2025 Other professions All tasks public Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
25
Entries on its own leaderboard, 24 models we track

GPT-6 Astra leads with 69.5%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra 69.5%
  2. 2 Gemini 3 Pro 69.1%
  3. 3 Gemini 3.8 Flash 69%
  4. 4 o3 67.6%
  5. 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 67.4%
  6. 6 GPT-5 67.2%
  7. 7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 67%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 4.5 66.7%
  9. 9 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 65.5%
  10. 10 GPT-5 mini 65.3%
  11. 11 o4-mini 64.8%
  12. 12 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 64.6%
  13. 13 Claude Sonnet 4.5 64.2%
  14. 14 Grok 4 Fast reasoning 64.1%
  15. 15 GPT-5.1 62.9%
  16. 16 Claude Haiku 4.5 61.8%
  17. 17 Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506 60.8%
  18. 18 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 58.6%
  19. 19 Claude 3.5 Haiku 57.6%
  20. 20 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.8%
  21. 21 gpt-oss-120b 50.5%
  22. 22 Mistral Small 3.1 47.9%
  23. 23 gpt-oss-20b 43.5%
  24. 24 DeepSeek-V3.1 36.6%
  25. 25 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 29.1%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 69.5% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Pro 69.1% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.8 Flash 69% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 o3 67.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 67.4% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5 67.2% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 67% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 4.5 66.7% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 65.5% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5 mini 65.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
11 o4-mini 64.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Grok 4.1 Fast 64.6% reasoning Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Claude Sonnet 4.5 64.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Grok 4 Fast 64.1% reasoning Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5.1 62.9% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Haiku 4.5 61.8% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506 60.8% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 58.6% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Claude 3.5 Haiku 57.6% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
21 gpt-oss-120b 50.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Mistral Small 3.1 47.9% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
23 gpt-oss-20b 43.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
24 DeepSeek-V3.1 36.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
25 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 29.1% May 2025 Official leaderboard

3 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard 3 leaders
GPT-6 Astra 69.5%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Gemini 3 Pro o3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Claude 3.5 Sonnet

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%