Expert comparisons on biothreat information
Only in system cards
PhD biology experts compare model answers to expert answers on long-form biorisk questions. Scored as win rate on accuracy, understanding and ease of execution.
OpenAI Preparedness evaluation. Results are reported per dimension for pre-mitigation models.
Made by OpenAI Released Sep 2024 Hazardous knowledge Tasks kept private Last in a system card Jan 2025
Last model added Jan 2025
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by people Human experts grade or compare the outputs.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for Expert comparisons on biothreat information yet.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
4 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Jan 2025 | o3-mini system card | Expert comparisons, win rates shown for pre-mitigation models only (5.4.2) | Bio and chem risk | |
| 5 Dec 2024 | o1 system card | Expert Human Preference Win Rates, o1 (pre-mitigation) 75.0% accuracy, 68.7% understanding, 80.5% ease of execution, no overall score (5.5.2) | Bio and chem risk | |
| 12 Sep 2024 | o1-preview system card | Expert comparisons win rates, o1-preview (pre-mitigation) 72.4% accuracy, 69.5% understanding, 74.3% ease of execution, no overall score (4.3.2) | Bio and chem risk | |
| 12 Sep 2024 | o1-mini system card | Expert comparisons win rates, o1-mini (pre-mitigation) 67.4% accuracy, 50.6% understanding, 79.6% ease of execution, no overall score (4.3.2) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% - GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer.
Intern-S2-397B 62.4% - TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
- BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference.
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%