EnvSimBench
Language models act as simulators of tool environments for agent training. Given a trajectory of agent actions, the model predicts the next environment state and feedback. Labels come from real executors, so the score checks whether simulated states match what the real environment would return.
It tests the simulator, not the agent. Samples come from EnvScaler environments. The release includes a 4B simulation model. About 208 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- EnvSimBench authors
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- Apps and MCP servers
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.4 #27 on the capability index
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Scalable AI agents training relies on interactive environments that faithfully simulate the consequences of agent actions. Manually crafted environments are expensive to build, brittle to extend, and fundamentally limited in diversity. A promising direction is to replace manually crafted environments with LLM-simulated counterparts. However, this paradigm hinges on an unexamined core assumption: LLMs can accurately simulate environmental feedback. In practice, LLM-simulated environments suffer from hallucinations, logical inconsistencies, and silent state drift failures that corrupt agent reward signals and compound the construction costs that the paradigm was designed to eliminate. To address this gap, we propose EnvSimBench with four contributions: 1) We provide the first formal definition and operationalization of Environment Simulation Ability (EnvSim Ability) as a quantifiable research objective. 2) We construct EnvSimBench, a rigorous benchmark covering 400 samples across 167 diverse environments, equipped with verifiable labels and fine-grained difficulty stratification along three axes. 3) Systematic evaluations reveal that all state-of-the-art language models suffer from a universal state change cliff: they achieve near-perfect accuracy on tasks when the environment state remains invariant, yet fail catastrophically when multiple states need simultaneous updates. This finding exposes EnvSim Ability as a critical yet largely unaddressed capability gap. 4) We design a constraint-driven simulation pipeline that substantially reduces hallucination, boosts environment synthesis yield by 6.8%, and cuts costs by over 90%. Overall, EnvSimBench serves as both a diagnostic framework and a practical optimization path for reliable LLM-based environment simulation, establishing a foundation for scalable agent training. Code and data are available at https://github.com/cookieApril/EnvSimBench
Ours (Full-Balance2, 4B) tops the leaderboard with 45.3%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen3.5 397B-A17B, at 42.3%.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Ours (Full-Balance2, 4B) 400-sample evaluation 45.3%
- 2
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 400-sample evaluation 42.3%
- 3
Gemini 3.1 Pro 400-sample evaluation 42%
- 4 GPT-5.4 400-sample evaluation 42%
- 5
MiniMax-M2.7 400-sample evaluation 41.8%
- 6 GLM-5 400-sample evaluation 41%
- 7 Claude Sonnet 4.6 400-sample evaluation 37.8%
- 8
DeepSeek-V3.2 400-sample evaluation 32.5%
Source: Official EnvSimBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ours (Full-Balance2, 4B) | 45.3% | 400-sample evaluation | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 42.3% | 400-sample evaluation | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 42% | 400-sample evaluation | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-5.4 | 42% | 400-sample evaluation | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 41.8% | 400-sample evaluation | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GLM-5 | 41% | 400-sample evaluation | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 37.8% | 400-sample evaluation | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 32.5% | 400-sample evaluation | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official EnvSimBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official EnvSimBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%