EnterpriseClawBench
Agents do 852 tasks rebuilt from real proprietary workplace agent sessions, each with fixtures, hard rules and semantic rubrics.
81 HF paper upvotes. The sessions hold internal enterprise content, so not all of it is public.
In the authors’ words
Enterprise agents increasingly operate inside workspaces: they read heterogeneous files, invoke tools, and deliver business artifacts. We introduce EnterpriseClawBench, an enterprise agent benchmark constructed from proprietary, real-world agent sessions. Starting from a large archive of workplace sessions, the EnterpriseClawBench produces 852 reproducible tasks, each paired with recovered fixtures, rewritten prompts, role classes, skill subclasses, hard rules, and semantic rubrics. Because the sessions contain internal enterprise content, we do not release the benchmark data; instead, our reusable contribution is the construction and evaluation protocol. On EnterpriseClawBench, the best configuration reaches only 0.663 (Codex with GPT-5.5). These results show that enterprise agent evaluation must report harness–model combinations, artifact delivery, visual quality, cost, runtime, and skill-transfer behavior, rather than collapsing performance into a single score. Code: https://github.com/FrontisAI/EnterpriseClawBench
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
GPT-5.5 leads with 66.3% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 15 more
- 1 GPT-5.5 66.3%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 64.4%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 63.5%
- 4
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 58.8%
- 5 Kimi K2.6 56.1%
- 6
MiniMax-M3 52.5%
- 7 Claude Haiku 4.5 51.3%
- 8 GPT-4.1 mini 28.6%
- 9
Qwen3-235B-A22B 27%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.5 | 66.3% | Codex | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 64.4% | Claude Code | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 63.5% | Claude Code | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 58.8% | OpenClaw | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Kimi K2.6 | 56.1% | Hermes | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 52.5% | Hermes | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 51.3% | Claude Code | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-4.1 mini | 28.6% | Hermes | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 27% | Hermes | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%