EmbodiedBench EB-Navigation
Agents use visual observations and low-level movement actions to reach target objects in AI2-THOR. The score is the published average task success percentage.
One track of EmbodiedBench. The EmbodiedBench record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.
- Released
- February 2025
- Kind
- Simulated robots
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
- Last model added
- April 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Leveraging Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to create embodied agents offers a promising avenue for tackling real-world tasks. While language-centric embodied agents have garnered substantial attention, MLLM-based embodied agents remain underexplored due to the lack of comprehensive evaluation frameworks. To bridge this gap, we introduce EmbodiedBench, an extensive benchmark designed to evaluate vision-driven embodied agents. EmbodiedBench features: (1) a diverse set of 1,128 testing tasks across four environments, ranging from high-level semantic tasks (e.g., household) to low-level tasks involving atomic actions (e.g., navigation and manipulation); and (2) six meticulously curated subsets evaluating essential agent capabilities like commonsense reasoning, complex instruction understanding, spatial awareness, visual perception, and long-term planning. Through extensive experiments, we evaluated 24 leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs within EmbodiedBench. Our findings reveal that: MLLMs excel at high-level tasks but struggle with low-level manipulation, with the best model, GPT-4o, scoring only 28.9% on average. EmbodiedBench provides a multifaceted standardized evaluation platform that not only highlights existing challenges but also offers valuable insights to advance MLLM-based embodied agents. Our code and dataset are available at https://embodiedbench.github.io.
GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 57.7%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is InternVL3-78B, at 53.7%.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 57.7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 53.7
InternVL3-78B
- 50.7
InternVL3-38B
- 48.7 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 47.7
Ovis2-16B
- 45.7
Ovis2-34B
- 45.4
Gemma 3 27B
- 45.0 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 44.7 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 41.7 Gemini-1.5-flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 40.0
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 39.7 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified)
- 34.0
Gemma 3 12B
- 32.8 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified)
- 30.7
InternVL2_5-78B
- 30.3
InternVL2.5-38B
- 30.0
Llama 3.2 90B
- 29.3
InternVL3-8B
- 24.3 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 21.4
Llama 3.2 11B
- 21.3
InternVL2.5-8B
- 21.2 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
- 20.3
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 14.0 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 57.7%
- 2
InternVL3-78B 53.7%
- 3
InternVL3-38B 50.7%
- 4 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) 48.7%
- 5
Ovis2-16B 47.7%
- 6
Ovis2-34B 45.7%
- 7
Gemma 3 27B 45.4%
- 8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 45%
- 9 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 44.7%
- 10 Gemini-1.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) 41.7%
- 11
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 40%
- 12 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 39.7%
- 13
Gemma 3 12B 34%
- 14 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 32.8%
- 15
InternVL2_5-78B 30.7%
- 16
InternVL2.5-38B 30.3%
- 17
Llama 3.2 90B 30%
- 18
InternVL3-8B 29.3%
- 19 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 24.3%
- 20
Llama 3.2 11B 21.4%
- 21
InternVL2.5-8B 21.3%
- 22 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 21.2%
- 23
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 20.3%
- 24 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 14%
Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-Navigation leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 57.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | | 53.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 50.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) | 48.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 47.7% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 45.7% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 45.4% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 45% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 44.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Gemini-1.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) | 41.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | | 40% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) | 39.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 34% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) | 32.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | | 30.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 30.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 30% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 29.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 24.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | | 21.4% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 21.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | 21.2% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 20.3% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 14% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-Navigation leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-Navigation leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%