Benchmark Almanac

EmbodiedBench EB-Manipulation

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 28.9% tops its leaderboard Claude 3.7 Sonnet 28.5% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Agents use visual observations to control a robot arm for object manipulation in simulation. The score is the published average task success percentage.

One track of EmbodiedBench. The EmbodiedBench record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.

Released
February 2025
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last model added
April 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Leveraging Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to create embodied agents offers a promising avenue for tackling real-world tasks. While language-centric embodied agents have garnered substantial attention, MLLM-based embodied agents remain underexplored due to the lack of comprehensive evaluation frameworks. To bridge this gap, we introduce EmbodiedBench, an extensive benchmark designed to evaluate vision-driven embodied agents. EmbodiedBench features: (1) a diverse set of 1,128 testing tasks across four environments, ranging from high-level semantic tasks (e.g., household) to low-level tasks involving atomic actions (e.g., navigation and manipulation); and (2) six meticulously curated subsets evaluating essential agent capabilities like commonsense reasoning, complex instruction understanding, spatial awareness, visual perception, and long-term planning. Through extensive experiments, we evaluated 24 leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs within EmbodiedBench. Our findings reveal that: MLLMs excel at high-level tasks but struggle with low-level manipulation, with the best model, GPT-4o, scoring only 28.9% on average. EmbodiedBench provides a multifaceted standardized evaluation platform that not only highlights existing challenges but also offers valuable insights to advance MLLM-based embodied agents. Our code and dataset are available at https://embodiedbench.github.io.

Abstract of EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents (arXiv:2502.09560, CC0)
24
Entries on its own leaderboard, 17 models we track

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 28.9%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3.7 Sonnet, at 28.5%.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 28.9%
  2. 2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 28.5%
  3. 3 Ovis2-34B 26.8%
  4. 4 InternVL3-78B 26.3%
  5. 5 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 25.4%
  6. 6 InternVL3-38B 22.6%
  7. 7 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 21.1%
  8. 8 Gemma 3 12B 20.6%
  9. 9 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 18%
  10. 10 InternVL2_5-78B 18%
  11. 11 Gemma 3 27B 17.5%
  12. 12 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) 16.7%
  13. 13 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 16.2%
  14. 14 InternVL2.5-38B 15.8%
  15. 15 Llama 3.2 90B 14.9%
  16. 16 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 13.6%
  17. 17 InternVL3-8B 11.5%
  18. 18 Ovis2-16B 11.3%
  19. 19 Gemini-1.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) 9.60%
  20. 20 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 9.60%
  21. 21 InternVL2.5-8B 7.00%
  22. 22 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 4.80%
  23. 23 Llama 3.2 11B 0.90%
  24. 24 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 0.10%

Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-Manipulation leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 28.9% Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 28.5% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Ovis2-34B 26.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 InternVL3-78B 26.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 25.4% Official leaderboard
6 InternVL3-38B 22.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 21.1% Official leaderboard
8 Gemma 3 12B 20.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 18% Official leaderboard
10 InternVL2_5-78B 18% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Gemma 3 27B 17.5% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) 16.7% Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 16.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
14 InternVL2.5-38B 15.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Llama 3.2 90B 14.9% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 13.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
17 InternVL3-8B 11.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Ovis2-16B 11.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini-1.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) 9.60% Official leaderboard
20 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 9.60% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
21 InternVL2.5-8B 7.00% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
22 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 4.80% Official leaderboard
23 Llama 3.2 11B 0.90% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 0.10% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Shanghai AI Lab Alibaba International Digital Commerce (AIDC-AI) Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025

Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-Manipulation leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet InternVL2_5-78B Llama 3.2 90B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet InternVL2_5-78B

Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-Manipulation leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 103 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%