E-Commerce Bench
Agents start with 100,000 yuan and run up to four online stores for 365 simulated days on real market data. They source, negotiate with suppliers, price, promote and manage cash. Scored by end-of-year assets over the opening balance.
Six more dimensions are scored separately, including negotiation and fraud avoidance. Each model runs 5 episodes. The paper tests 18 models and the repo table lists 21. The qwen.ai post is dated 2026-09-03.
In the authors’ words
Long-horizon agentic tasks go beyond chaining short tasks over more interaction turns. Their evolving dynamic environments and long-range dependencies require Large Language Models (LLMs) to continually explore, learn from experience, and adapt their policies over thousands of steps. We introduce E-Commerce Bench, the first open-source benchmark that integrates multi-round counterpart negotiation and dynamic events into a year-long business operation. Over a 365-day year, an LLM agent concurrently runs multiple online stores, researching the market, negotiating with suppliers to source inventory, optimizing sales strategies, fulfilling orders, handling returns, and managing cash flow to maximize its end-of-year total assets. To construct a realistic merchant-side operating environment, the product and supplier data are derived from a real e-commerce platform, while a year-long calendar of promotions, natural disasters, and supply-chain shocks continually reshapes demand. For reproducibility, both sides of the market are deterministic: customer purchases and returns follow a fixed demand model, while a negotiation kernel determines supplier pricing, concessions, and decisions, with an LLM used only to verbalize them. We evaluate 18 frontier models across seven dimensions, including year-end assets, and find that no single model dominates. GPT-5.6 Sol earns the most, growing the 100,000 opening stake into 1,431,425, yet it ranks 16th of 18 on fraud avoidance and trails Fable5 in operational efficiency. Among open-weight models, Qwen3.8-Max-Preview leads with 416,252, 38% above GLM 5.2 (high), and achieves the strongest learning over the horizon, progressively bargaining down prices across repeated orders. Our code is available at https://github.com/QwenLM/E-CommerceBench.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 14.3 among models released by Aug 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 11 more
- 14.3 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 8.05 Claude Fable 5
- 7.02 GPT-5.5
- 4.98 Claude Opus 4.8
- 4.72
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 3.91 GLM-5.3
- 3.01 GLM-5.2
- 2.65 Kimi K3
- 2.59 Claude Opus 4.7
- 2.58 Claude Opus 4.6
- 2.58 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 2.26 GLM-5.1
- 1.90
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 1.90
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 1.65
Qwen3.7-Max
- 1.30
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 0.70 Kimi K2.6
- 0.47
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 0.01
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)
- 1 GPT-5.6 Sol max 14.3
- 2 Claude Fable 5 max 8.05
- 3 GPT-5.5 7.02
- 4 Claude Opus 4.8 max 4.98
- 5
Qwen 3.8 Max 4.72
- 6 GLM-5.3 max 3.91
- 7 GLM-5.2 high 3.01
- 8 Kimi K3 2.65
- 9 Claude Opus 4.7 max 2.59
- 10 Claude Opus 4.6 max 2.58
- 11 GLM-5.3-Flash max 2.58
- 12 GLM-5.1 2.26
- 13
DeepSeek-V4-Pro max 1.90
- 14
Gemini 3.5 Flash 1.90
- 15
Qwen3.7-Max 1.65
- 16
Gemini 3.1 Pro 1.30
- 17 Kimi K2.6 0.70
- 18
Qwen 3.6 Plus 0.47
- 19
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) 0.01
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 14.3 | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5 | 8.05 | max | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5.5 | 7.02 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 4.98 | max | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 4.72 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GLM-5.3 | 3.91 | max | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GLM-5.2 | 3.01 | high | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi K3 | 2.65 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 2.59 | max | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 2.58 | max | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 2.58 | max | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GLM-5.1 | 2.26 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 1.90 | max | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 1.90 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 1.65 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 1.30 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Kimi K2.6 | 0.70 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 0.47 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 0.01 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%