Benchmark Almanac

DNA sequence design for transcription factor binding

GPT-5.5 Pro 16.5% leads since Apr 2026 Only in system cards

Models design DNA sequences that bind 11 Nucleobench transcription factors, scored by BPNet oracles against the Ledidi baseline. Scored as pass@1.

OpenAI Preparedness evaluation. The concern threshold is an 80 percent win rate over Ledidi.

Made by OpenAI Released Apr 2026 Genomics and life sciences Tasks kept private Last in a system card Sep 2026 Last model added Sep 2026
Level
Research frontier Researchers, on open problems or tasks that take days
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Prediction Probabilities for events that have not happened yet.
4
Models scored in lab cards
6
System cards report it, from 1 lab

GPT-5.5 Pro leads with 16.5% among models released by Sep 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.5 Pro 16.5%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 13.8%
  3. 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 13.7%
  4. 4 GPT-6 Astra 11.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.5 Pro 16.5% Apr 2026 Model card
2 GPT-5.5 13.8% Apr 2026 Model card
3 GPT-5.6 Sol 13.7% Jun 2026 Model card
4 GPT-6 Astra 11.3% Sep 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 Pro 16.5%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5 Pro

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

6 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
3 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Astra system card 11.3 DNA sequence design for Transcription Factor binding, pass@1 win rate over Ledidi, retiring evaluation (Table 17) Bio and chem risk
6 Aug 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum 12.6 DNA sequence design for Transcription Factor binding, pass@1, GPT-5.6 Sol (August) (7.1.1.6) Bio and chem risk
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card 13.7 DNA sequence design for transcription factor binding, pass@1 (Table 3, 9.1.1.7) Bio and chem risk
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card 13.7 DNA sequence design for transcription factor binding, pass@1 (Table 3, 9.1.1.7) Bio and chem risk
23 Apr 2026 GPT-5.5 system card 13.8 DNA sequence design for Transcription Factor binding, pass@1 (Table 13) Bio and chem risk
23 Apr 2026 GPT-5.5 Pro system card 16.5 DNA sequence design for Transcription Factor binding, pass@1, GPT-5.5 Pro (Table 13) Bio and chem risk

More in Biology and chemistry

All 96 in Biology and chemistry
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. Intern-S2-397B 62.4%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
  • BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference. Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%