Benchmark Almanac

DeepShop

MolmoWeb 8B 42.3% leads since Mar 2026 Fading

Web agents answer complex shopping queries on live sites with product attributes, search filters and sorting preferences. An LLM judge checks whether results meet each requirement.

Queries are made harder by LLM-driven complexity evolution. Ai2 runs it on Amazon for MolmoWeb.

In the authors’ words

Web agents for online shopping have shown great promise in automating user interactions across e-commerce platforms. Benchmarks for assessing such agents do not reflect the complexity of real-world shopping scenarios, as they often consist of overly simple queries with deterministic paths, such as "Find iPhone 15." Real shopping scenarios are inherently more layered, involving multi-dimensional product attributes, search filters, and user-specific sorting preferences. To address this gap, we introduce DeepShop, a benchmark designed to evaluate web agents in complex and realistic online shopping environments. DeepShop comprises three key components. (1) Query diversity evolution: Starting from real user queries, we generate diverse queries across five popular online shopping domains. (2) Query complexity evolution: We further evolve these queries to increase complexity, considering product attributes, search filters, and sorting preferences, and classify them into three levels: easy, medium, and hard, based on the number of evolutions. (3) Fine-grained and holistic evaluation: We propose an automated evaluation framework that assesses agent performance in terms of fine-grained aspects (product attributes, search filters, and sorting preferences) and reports the overall success rate through holistic evaluation. We conduct a systematic evaluation of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods, web agents, and deep research systems. Results show that RAG struggles with complex queries due to its lack of web interaction, while other methods face significant challenges with filters and sorting preferences, leading to low overall success rates. We also perform cross-category, complexity-based evaluations and error analyses to support the advancement of deep research shopping agents.

Abstract of DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agents (arXiv:2506.02839, CC0)
Made by Lyu et al. (University of Amsterdam and collaborators) Released Jun 2025 Web browsing All tasks public Last in a launch post Mar 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Apr 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

MolmoWeb 8B leads with 42.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 MolmoWeb 8B 42.3%
  2. 2 Fara-7B 26.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MolmoWeb 8B 42.3% Mar 2026 Model card
2 Fara-7B 26.2% Nov 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Microsoft Ai2
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2026
MolmoWeb 8B 42.3%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MolmoWeb 8B Fara-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MolmoWeb 8B Fara-7B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Mar 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Microsoft
Ai2
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
24 Mar 2026 MolmoWeb 8B 42.3 DeepShop
24 Nov 2025 Fara-7B 26.2 DeepShop

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
9 Apr 2026 MolmoWeb 8B technical report 42.3 DeepShop, GPT-4o judge, 100 steps (Table 4) Capabilities
24 Nov 2025 Fara-7B technical report 26.2 DeepShop success rate, mean of 3 runs, 26.2 ± 2.0 (Table 9, Table 19) Capabilities

More in Computer and browser use

All 56 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. Kimi K3 74.4%