Benchmark Almanac

CursorBench 3.1

Claude Fable 5 72.9% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Agents do ambiguous multi-file coding tasks from real Cursor sessions in Cursor's harness. Version 3.1 added codebase understanding, bug finding, planning and code review problems. Agentic graders score correctness.

Cursor's changelog dates it 2026-05-19 and says it also improved grading for some edit tasks. Cursor says 3.1 scores should be compared only within the same version.

Made by Cursor Released May 2026 Fixing real repositories Tasks kept private Last in a launch post May 2026 , dropped for a newer version Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
4
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude Fable 5 leads with 72.9% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5 72.9%
  2. 2 Composer 2.5 63.2%
  3. 3 Composer 2 61.3%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 5 61.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5 72.9% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Composer 2.5 63.2% May 2026 Model card
3 Composer 2 61.3% Mar 2026 Model card
4 Claude Sonnet 5 61.2% Jun 2026 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Cursor Anthropic
Lab claims Replaced by 3.2, Jul 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Fable 5 Composer 2.5 Composer 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Fable 5 Composer 2.5

Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Cursor
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 May 2026 Composer 2.5 63.2 CursorBench v3.1 (harder tasks)
19 Mar 2026 Composer 2 61.3 CursorBench

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 61.2 CursorBench at max effort, measured by Cursor, version not stated (xhigh 59.0%, high 57.0%) (8.5, Figure 8.5.A) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 72.9 CursorBench at max effort, measured and reported by Cursor in its production harness, version not stated (8.7, Figure 8.7.A) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Cursor xAI Anthropic
CursorBench 4.0 5 leaders
CursorBench 1 leader
Composer 2 61.3%
CursorBench 3.2 Replaced by 4.0, Sep 2026

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471