CRMArena
Agents do nine customer-service CRM tasks for service agent, analyst and manager personas inside a real Salesforce org. The org holds 16 linked object types with seeded hidden patterns.
NAACL 2025. Data is CC BY-NC 4.0. The shared repo with CRMArena-Pro has 157 stars.
In the authors’ words
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems are vital for modern enterprises, providing a foundation for managing customer interactions and data. Integrating AI agents into CRM systems can automate routine processes and enhance personalized service. However, deploying and evaluating these agents is challenging due to the lack of realistic benchmarks that reflect the complexity of real-world CRM tasks. To address this issue, we introduce CRMArena, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on realistic tasks grounded in professional work environments. Following guidance from CRM experts and industry best practices, we designed CRMArena with nine customer service tasks distributed across three personas: service agent, analyst, and manager. The benchmark includes 16 commonly used industrial objects (e.g., account, order, knowledge article, case) with high interconnectivity, along with latent variables (e.g., complaint habits, policy violations) to simulate realistic data distributions. Experimental results reveal that state-of-the-art LLM agents succeed in less than 40% of the tasks with ReAct prompting, and less than 55% even with function-calling abilities. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced agent capabilities in function-calling and rule-following to be deployed in real-world work environments. CRMArena is an open challenge to the community: systems that can reliably complete tasks showcase direct business value in a popular work environment.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
o1 leads with 64.3% among models released by Jan 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jan 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1 o1 64.3%
- 2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 54.4%
- 3
Llama 3.1-405B 51.3%
- 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 41.8%
- 5
Llama 3.1-70B 41.1%
- 6
DeepSeek-R1 35.1%
- 7 GPT-4o mini 28.3%
- 8 Claude 3 Sonnet 17.3%
- 9
Llama 3.1-8B 3.10%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o1 | 64.3% | Function Calling | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 54.4% | Function Calling | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 51.3% | Function Calling | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 41.8% | Function Calling | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 41.1% | Function Calling | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 35.1% | ReAct | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-4o mini | 28.3% | ReAct | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 17.3% | ReAct | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 3.10% | ReAct | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%