Benchmark Almanac

CRMArena

o1 64.3% leads since Dec 2024 Not in model cards

Agents do nine customer-service CRM tasks for service agent, analyst and manager personas inside a real Salesforce org. The org holds 16 linked object types with seeded hidden patterns.

NAACL 2025. Data is CC BY-NC 4.0. The shared repo with CRMArena-Pro has 157 stars.

In the authors’ words

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems are vital for modern enterprises, providing a foundation for managing customer interactions and data. Integrating AI agents into CRM systems can automate routine processes and enhance personalized service. However, deploying and evaluating these agents is challenging due to the lack of realistic benchmarks that reflect the complexity of real-world CRM tasks. To address this issue, we introduce CRMArena, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on realistic tasks grounded in professional work environments. Following guidance from CRM experts and industry best practices, we designed CRMArena with nine customer service tasks distributed across three personas: service agent, analyst, and manager. The benchmark includes 16 commonly used industrial objects (e.g., account, order, knowledge article, case) with high interconnectivity, along with latent variables (e.g., complaint habits, policy violations) to simulate realistic data distributions. Experimental results reveal that state-of-the-art LLM agents succeed in less than 40% of the tasks with ReAct prompting, and less than 55% even with function-calling abilities. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced agent capabilities in function-calling and rule-following to be deployed in real-world work environments. CRMArena is an open challenge to the community: systems that can reliably complete tasks showcase direct business value in a popular work environment.

Abstract of CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments (arXiv:2411.02305, CC0)
Made by Salesforce AI Research Released Nov 2024 Customer service All tasks public Last model added Jan 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
9
Models scored on its own leaderboard

o1 leads with 64.3% among models released by Jan 2025

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jan 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 o1 64.3%
  2. 2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 54.4%
  3. 3 Llama 3.1-405B 51.3%
  4. 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 41.8%
  5. 5 Llama 3.1-70B 41.1%
  6. 6 DeepSeek-R1 35.1%
  7. 7 GPT-4o mini 28.3%
  8. 8 Claude 3 Sonnet 17.3%
  9. 9 Llama 3.1-8B 3.10%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 o1 64.3% Function Calling Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 54.4% Function Calling Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Llama 3.1-405B 51.3% Function Calling Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 41.8% Function Calling Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Llama 3.1-70B 41.1% Function Calling Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-R1 35.1% ReAct Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o mini 28.3% ReAct Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Claude 3 Sonnet 17.3% ReAct Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Llama 3.1-8B 3.10% ReAct Jul 2024 Official leaderboard

3 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jan 2025
o1 64.3%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) o1 GPT-4o Llama 3.1-405B Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude 3 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) o1 GPT-4o

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Tool use

All 125 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%