Benchmark Almanac

CodeXGLUE

CodeBERT Baseline 57.5 tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

A suite of 10 code tasks across 14 datasets, grouped as code to code, text to code, code to text and text to text. Tasks include clone detection, defect detection, code completion, code repair, code search, code generation and code summarization. Each task has its own metric, such as accuracy, BLEU or MRR.

Built for fine-tuned code models such as CodeBERT, and its leaderboard has few recent entries. Several datasets come from earlier work. About 1,850 GitHub stars.

Released
February 2021
Kind
Function-level problems
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public

In the authors’ words

Benchmark datasets have a significant impact on accelerating research in programming language tasks. In this paper, we introduce CodeXGLUE, a benchmark dataset to foster machine learning research for program understanding and generation. CodeXGLUE includes a collection of 10 tasks across 14 datasets and a platform for model evaluation and comparison. CodeXGLUE also features three baseline systems, including the BERT-style, GPT-style, and Encoder-Decoder models, to make it easy for researchers to use the platform. The availability of such data and baselines can help the development and validation of new methods that can be applied to various program understanding and generation problems.

Abstract of CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation (arXiv:2102.04664, CC0)
1
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

CodeBERT Baseline tops the leaderboard with 57.5

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 CodeBERT Baseline 57.5

Source: Official CodeXGLUE leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 CodeBERT Baseline 57.5 Aug 2020 Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471