Benchmark Almanac

CoBench (Anthropic)

Claude Opus 5.5 55.8% Only in system cards

500 real internal Anthropic R&D problems. Percentage solved in one attempt tracks AI R&D acceleration.

v2.1 scores not comparable with earlier CoBench versions.

Made by Anthropic Labs' internal R&D tests Tasks kept private Last in a system card Sep 2026 Last model added Sep 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 55.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 55.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 55.8% Sep 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card 55.8 CoBench 2.1, share of 500 internal R&D problems solved in one attempt, API safety filter off. Not comparable with earlier CoBench versions (2.3.4.1, Figure 2.3.4.1.A) AI R&D risk

More in AI research

All 83 in AI research
  • MLS-Bench In use Agent must invent one algorithmic change in an ML research scaffold whose gain transfers across settings. Scored relative to human baselines. Claude Fable 5.1 50.3%
  • PaperBench In use Agent replicates ICML 2024 papers from scratch. LLM judge grades against author-written hierarchical rubrics. Qwen 3.8 Max 93%
  • MLE-bench In use Kaggle-style ML engineering competitions. Agent trains models and is scored against competition leaderboards. GPT-6 Astra 93.8%
  • PostTrainBench 1.2 In use CLI agent gets a base model, one H100 and a time budget to post-train it for a target benchmark. Scored on normalized gain. Claude Fable 5.1 44.6%
  • KernelBench In use Replace PyTorch operators with faster custom GPU kernels. Scored on correctness and speedup. MiniMax-M3 28.8%
  • OpenAI PRs Only in system cards Agents replicate internal OpenAI pull requests from a pre-PR branch and a prompt. Graded by hidden unit tests as pass@1. GPT-5.2 55%