CBRN open-ended questions
Only in system cards
Experts review model answers to single and multi-turn CBRN threat scenario questions for accuracy, novelty and actionable uplift.
In-house Google DeepMind evaluation. Results are usually qualitative.
Made by Google DeepMind Released Mar 2025 Hazardous knowledge Tasks kept private Last in a system card Nov 2025
Last model added Nov 2025
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by people Human experts grade or compare the outputs.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for CBRN open-ended questions yet.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Nov 2025 |  Gemini 3 Pro system card | Open-Ended Questions: high scientific accuracy, low novelty, insufficient detail for low-medium resourced actors, no score (CBRN, p.7) | Bio and chem risk | |
| 7 Jul 2025 | Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report | CBRN open-ended questions (bio, radiological, nuclear), qualitative expert assessment, no score: detailed and accurate but not consistently enabling key bottleneck steps (Section 5.7) | Bio and chem risk | |
| 28 Apr 2025 | Gemini 2.5 Pro model card | CBRN open-ended questions (bio, radiological, nuclear), qualitative expert assessment, no score (CBRN section) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% - GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer.
Intern-S2-397B 62.4% - TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
- BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference.
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%