Benchmark Almanac

C3

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 97.8% leads since Aug 2025 Dropped

Models answer 19,577 multiple-choice questions on Chinese dialogues and texts from Chinese-as-a-second-language exams. Scoring is accuracy.

In the authors’ words

Machine reading comprehension tasks require a machine reader to answer questions relevant to the given document. In this paper, we present the first free-form multiple-Choice Chinese machine reading Comprehension dataset (C^3), containing 13,369 documents (dialogues or more formally written mixed-genre texts) and their associated 19,577 multiple-choice free-form questions collected from Chinese-as-a-second-language examinations. We present a comprehensive analysis of the prior knowledge (i.e., linguistic, domain-specific, and general world knowledge) needed for these real-world problems. We implement rule-based and popular neural methods and find that there is still a significant performance gap between the best performing model (68.5%) and human readers (96.0%), especially on problems that require prior knowledge. We further study the effects of distractor plausibility and data augmentation based on translated relevant datasets for English on model performance. We expect C^3 to present great challenges to existing systems as answering 86.8% of questions requires both knowledge within and beyond the accompanying document, and we hope that C^3 can serve as a platform to study how to leverage various kinds of prior knowledge to better understand a given written or orally oriented text. C^3 is available at https://dataset.org/c3/.

Abstract of Investigating Prior Knowledge for Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension (arXiv:1904.09679, CC0)
Made by Tencent AI Lab and Cornell University Released Apr 2019 Reading in many languages All tasks public Last in a launch post Dec 2024 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Feb 2026
Level
School Students, from grade school to high school
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
6
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
5
System cards report it, from 3 labs

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 97.8% among models released by Feb 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Feb 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 97.8%
  2. 2 GLM-4.5 83.1%
  3. 3 GLM-5 80.3%
  4. 4 DeepSeek-V3 78.6%
  5. 5 DeepSeek LLM 67B 77%
  6. 6 ChatGLM3-6B 73.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 97.8% Aug 2025 Model card
2 GLM-4.5 83.1% Aug 2025 Model card
3 GLM-5 80.3% Feb 2026 Model card
4 DeepSeek-V3 78.6% Dec 2024 Model card
5 DeepSeek LLM 67B 77% Jan 2024 Model card
6 ChatGLM3-6B 73.9% Jun 2024 Model card

4 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek Z.ai Shanghai AI Lab
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2025, by InternVL3.5-241B-A28B

The best score passed 85% in Aug 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B GLM-4.5 DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek LLM 67B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B GLM-4.5

No launch post has listed it since Dec 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
26 Dec 2024 DeepSeek-V3 78.6 C3 (Acc.)

5 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
17 Feb 2026 GLM-5 technical report 80.3 GLM-5-Base, C3 (EM) (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 97.8 C3, OpenCompass (Table 14) Capabilities
8 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5 technical report 83.1 GLM-4.5-Base, C3 (EM) (Table 2) Capabilities
18 Jun 2024 ChatGLM3-6B technical report 73.9 ChatGLM3-6B-Base, C3 (Table 1) Capabilities
5 Jan 2024 DeepSeek LLM 67B technical report 77 C3, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%