BLEnD
Models answer 52.6k questions about everyday culture in 16 countries and regions across 13 languages. Scoring is accuracy on short-answer and multiple-choice formats.
The multiple choice file was updated to v1.1 on 2025-05-02. On 2026-09-14 the maker added SemEval-2026 Task 7 data for 17 more language-culture pairs in a separate folder. Results that include it are a different set.
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) often lack culture-specific knowledge of daily life, especially across diverse regions and non-English languages. Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs' cultural sensitivities are limited to a single language or collected from online sources such as Wikipedia, which do not reflect the mundane everyday lifestyles of diverse regions. That is, information about the food people eat for their birthday celebrations, spices they typically use, musical instruments youngsters play, or the sports they practice in school is common cultural knowledge but uncommon in easily collected online sources, especially for underrepresented cultures. To address this issue, we introduce BLEnD, a hand-crafted benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' everyday knowledge across diverse cultures and languages. BLEnD comprises 52.6k question-answer pairs from 16 countries/regions, in 13 different languages, including low-resource ones such as Amharic, Assamese, Azerbaijani, Hausa, and Sundanese. We construct the benchmark to include two formats of questions: short-answer and multiple-choice. We show that LLMs perform better for cultures that are highly represented online, with a maximum 57.34% difference in GPT-4, the best-performing model, in the short-answer format. For cultures represented by mid-to-high-resource languages, LLMs perform better in their local languages, but for cultures represented by low-resource languages, LLMs perform better in English than the local languages. We make our dataset publicly available at: https://github.com/nlee0212/BLEnD.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Apertus 70B leads with 66.3% among models released by Sep 2025
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Apertus 70B 66.3%
- 2
Qwen2.5-72B 32.5%
- 3
Qwen2.5-32B 27.9%
- 4
Qwen2.5-14B 27%
- 5
Qwen2.5-7B 23.7%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 66.3% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 32.5% | Sep 2024 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 27.9% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 27% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 23.7% | Dec 2024 | Model card |
2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No launch post has listed it since Sep 2024
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Sep 2024 | 32.5 | BLEnD |
5 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sep 2025 | | 66.3 | BLEnD (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 23.7 | BLEnD, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Table 14) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 32.5 | BLEnD, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 27.9 | BLEnD, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 27 | BLEnD, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 14) | Capabilities |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Inkling 88.7%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%