Benchmark Almanac

BIRD-CRITIC

o1-preview 35.5% leads since Jan 2025 Not in model cards

Models fix real user SQL issues in MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server and Oracle applications. Test cases check each fix.

600 development tasks plus 200 held-out tests. Single-dialect sets include PostgreSQL (530 tasks) and SQLite (500 tasks, March 2026). NeurIPS 2025 paper.

In the authors’ words

Resolution of complex SQL issues persists as a significant bottleneck in real-world database applications. Current Large Language Models (LLMs), while adept at text-to-SQL translation, have not been rigorously evaluated on the more challenging task of debugging SQL issues. To address this gap, we introduce BIRD-CRITIC, a new SQL issue debugging benchmark comprising 530 PostgreSQL tasks (BIRD-CRITIC-PG) and 570 multi-dialect tasks (BIRD-CRITIC-Multi), distilled from authentic user issues and replayed within new environments to facilitate rigorous evaluation. Baseline evaluations underscore the task's complexity, with the leading reasoning model O3-Mini achieving only 38.87% success rate on BIRD-CRITIC-PG and 33.33% on BIRD-CRITIC-Multi. Meanwhile, advancing open-source models for database tasks is crucial for empowering local development while safeguarding data privacy. Therefore, we present Six-Gym (Sql-fIX-Gym), a training environment for elevating open-source model capabilities for SQL issue debugging. This environment leverages SQL-Rewind strategy, which automatically generates executable issue-solution datasets by reverse-engineering issues from verified SQLs. However, popular trajectory-based fine-tuning methods do not explore substantial supervisory signals. We further propose f-Plan Boosting, which extracts high-level debugging plans from SQL solutions, enabling teacher LLMs to produce 73.7% more successful trajectories for training. We integrate these components into an open-source agent, Bird-Fixer. Based on Qwen-2.5-Coder-14B, Bird-Fixer achieves 38.11% success rate on BIRD-CRITIC-PG and 29.65% on BIRD-CRITIC-Multi, surpassing leading proprietary models such as Claude-3.7-Sonnet and GPT-4.1, marking a significant step toward democratizing sophisticated SQL-debugging capabilities. The leaderboard and source code are available: https://bird-critic.github.io/

Abstract of SWE-SQL: Illuminating LLM Pathways to Solve User SQL Issues in Real-World Applications (arXiv:2506.18951, CC0)
Made by BIRD team (HKU) Released Jan 2025 Data science and SQL Public tasks plus a private test set Last model added Mar 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
9
Models scored on its own leaderboard

o1-preview leads with 35.5% among models released by Mar 2025

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 o1-preview 35.5%
  2. 2 DeepSeek-R1 32%
  3. 3 GPT-4o Nov 2024 27.5%
  4. 4 o1-mini 25%
  5. 5 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 24.5%
  6. 6 Phi-4 22%
  7. 7 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 21.5%
  8. 8 Gemini 2.0 Pro 21%
  9. 9 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 20%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 o1-preview 35.5% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
2 DeepSeek-R1 32% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o Nov 2024 27.5% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
4 o1-mini 25% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 24.5% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Phi-4 22% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 21.5% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 2.0 Pro 21% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 20% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2025
o1-preview 35.5%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) o1-preview Claude 3.5 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) o1-preview Claude 3.5 Sonnet

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471