BioSecBench-Function
Agents recover biological function from experimental data. Scored by verifiable checks. One of three LatchBio BioSecBench evaluations.
Repo is Apache 2.0 with a public subset. Scored on benchmarks.bio V1 as a capability benchmark. Paper link pending.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 73.6%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
- 73.6 Claude Opus 5.5
- 53.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 49.0 Claude Fable 5.1
- 48.6 GPT-6 Astra
- 46.0 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 44.8 Claude Opus 5
- 44.4
Gemini 4 Argon
- 44.0 Grok 4.6
- 43.3 Grok 4.7
- 43.1 Claude Opus 4.8
- 40.8
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 39.3 GPT-6 Sol
- 39.0 GPT-6.1 Terra
- 36.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 35.5 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 33.8 Claude Sonnet 5
- 33.7
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 32.7 Kimi K3
- 31.8 GLM-5.3
- 30.8 Claude Opus 4.7
- 28.8
Mistral Large 4
- 28.3 GPT-5.5
- 27.6 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 27.3 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 27.3 GPT-6 Luna
- 21.6
Nemotron 3 Ultra
- 13.8
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
- 1 Claude Opus 5.5 73.6%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 53.5%
- 3 Claude Fable 5.1 LSVP 49%
- 4 GPT-6 Astra 48.6%
- 5 GPT-6.1 Sol 46%
- 6 Claude Opus 5 44.8%
- 7
Gemini 4 Argon 44.4%
- 8 Grok 4.6 44%
- 9 Grok 4.7 43.3%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.8 43.1%
- 11
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 40.8%
- 12 GPT-6 Sol 39.3%
- 13 GPT-6.1 Terra 39%
- 14
Gemini 3.8 Flash 36%
- 15 GPT-5.6 Sol 35.5%
- 16 Claude Sonnet 5 33.8%
- 17
Gemini 3.7 Flash 33.7%
- 18 Kimi K3 32.7%
- 19 GLM-5.3 31.8%
- 20 Claude Opus 4.7 30.8%
- 21
Mistral Large 4 28.8%
- 22 GPT-5.5 28.3%
- 23 GPT-5.6 Luna 27.6%
- 24 Claude Sonnet 4.6 27.3%
- 25 GPT-6 Luna 27.3%
- 26
Nemotron 3 Ultra 21.6%
- 27
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 13.8%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 73.6% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 53.5% | Claude Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 49% | LSVP, Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra | 48.6% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 46% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Opus 5 | 44.8% | Claude Code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 44.4% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Grok 4.6 | 44% | Pi | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Grok 4.7 | 43.3% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 43.1% | Pi | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 40.8% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT-6 Sol | 39.3% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 39% | Pi | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 36% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 35.5% | Codex | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 33.8% | Claude Code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 33.7% | Pi | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Kimi K3 | 32.7% | Pi | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GLM-5.3 | 31.8% | Pi | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 30.8% | Pi | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 28.8% | Pi | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | GPT-5.5 | 28.3% | Pi | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 27.6% | Pi | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 27.3% | Claude Code | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | GPT-6 Luna | 27.3% | Pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 21.6% | Pi | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 13.8% | Pi | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
2 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Sep 2026 | Grok 4.7 model card | 43.3 | BioSecBench Function, endpoint pass rate, xhigh, Grok Build harness (7.1 table) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
- GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer.
Intern-S2-397B 62.4%
- TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties.
Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
- BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference.
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%