Benchmark Almanac

Belebele

Muse Glimmer 87.8% Only in system cards

Models answer multiple-choice reading comprehension questions on FLORES passages in 122 language variants. Scored by accuracy.

Labs often report a subset of languages or language-family averages.

In the authors’ words

We present Belebele, a multiple-choice machine reading comprehension (MRC) dataset spanning 122 language variants. Significantly expanding the language coverage of natural language understanding (NLU) benchmarks, this dataset enables the evaluation of text models in high-, medium-, and low-resource languages. Each question is based on a short passage from the Flores-200 dataset and has four multiple-choice answers. The questions were carefully curated to discriminate between models with different levels of general language comprehension. The English dataset on its own proves difficult enough to challenge state-of-the-art language models. Being fully parallel, this dataset enables direct comparison of model performance across all languages. We use this dataset to evaluate the capabilities of multilingual masked language models (MLMs) and large language models (LLMs). We present extensive results and find that despite significant cross-lingual transfer in English-centric LLMs, much smaller MLMs pretrained on balanced multilingual data still understand far more languages. We also observe that larger vocabulary size and conscious vocabulary construction correlate with better performance on low-resource languages. Overall, Belebele opens up new avenues for evaluating and analyzing the multilingual capabilities of NLP systems.

Abstract of The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variants (arXiv:2308.16884, CC0)
Made by Meta AI (Bandarkar et al.) Released Aug 2023 Reading in many languages All tasks public Last in a system card Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
1
Model scored in lab cards
5
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Muse Glimmer leads with 87.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Muse Glimmer 87.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Muse Glimmer 87.8% Oct 2026 Model card

The best score passed 85% in Oct 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Muse Glimmer 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Muse Glimmer

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

5 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
19 Oct 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 87.8 Belebele, high (Table 5) Capabilities
14 May 2025 Qwen3-4B technical report Belebele, 80 languages, thinking mode, language-family scores only, no overall: Indo-European 82.2, Sino-Tibetan 77.7, Afro-Asiatic 74.1, Austronesian 73.0, Dravidian 74.3, Turkic 76.3, Tai-Kadai 68.5, Uralic 83.0, Austroasiatic 74.5, Other 67.9 (Table 37) Capabilities
14 May 2025 Qwen3-32B technical report Belebele, 80 languages, thinking mode, language-family scores only, no overall: Indo-European 90.7, Sino-Tibetan 89.7, Afro-Asiatic 84.8, Austronesian 86.7, Dravidian 84.5, Turkic 89.3, Tai-Kadai 83.5, Uralic 91.3, Austroasiatic 88.0, Other 83.1 (Table 37) Capabilities
14 May 2025 Qwen3-14B technical report Belebele, 80 languages, thinking mode, language-family scores only, no overall: Indo-European 88.6, Sino-Tibetan 87.3, Afro-Asiatic 82.4, Austronesian 82.4, Dravidian 81.0, Turkic 83.8, Tai-Kadai 83.5, Uralic 91.0, Austroasiatic 82.5, Other 81.7 (Table 37) Capabilities
14 May 2025 Qwen3-1.7B technical report Belebele, 80 languages, thinking mode, language-family scores only, no overall: Indo-European 69.7, Sino-Tibetan 66.0, Afro-Asiatic 59.4, Austronesian 58.6, Dravidian 52.8, Turkic 57.8, Tai-Kadai 53.5, Uralic 70.3, Austroasiatic 63.5, Other 53.4 (Table 37) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%