Android Bench 2.0
Coding agents complete 30 long Android tasks such as building an app from mocks, library migrations and Flutter to native conversion. Tests and an LLM visual judge grade each run.
It reports pass rate plus a continuous completion rate, and runs models in their own harnesses such as Claude Code and Codex. The task set is private to limit contamination.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads with 40%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
- 1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 40%
- 2 Claude Opus 5.5 max 37.3%
- 3 GPT-6.1 Sol max 29.3%
- 4 GPT-6 Astra high 28%
- 5 Claude Fable 5.1 high 22.7%
- 6
Gemini 4 Argon high 21.3%
- 7
Qwen 3.8 Max 12.5%
- 8 Kimi K3 max 12%
- 9 GPT-6 Luna 10.7%
- 10
Gemini 3.8 Flash 8.00%
- 11
Gemini 3.7 Flash 7.30%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 40% | max, claude-code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 37.3% | max, claude-code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 29.3% | max, codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra | 28% | high, codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 22.7% | high, claude-code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 21.3% | high, antigravity-sdk | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 12.5% | qwen-coder | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi K3 | 12% | max, kimi-code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-6 Luna | 10.7% | codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 8.00% | antigravity-sdk | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 7.30% | antigravity-sdk | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
4 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471