ALFRED
Agents follow natural-language instructions to finish household tasks in the AI2-THOR simulator from first-person views, such as rinsing a mug and putting it in the coffee maker. The benchmark has expert demonstrations for 25,000 directives with both high-level goals and step-by-step instructions. Scores count tasks completed and goal conditions met in seen and unseen rooms.
The test sets are scored on the maker's leaderboard, which lists about 90 entries. Many entries are trained policies rather than language models. EmbodiedBench's EB-ALFRED adapts these tasks for multimodal models and is cataloged inside embodiedbench. About 530 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- University of Washington, Allen Institute for AI and collaborators
- Released
- December 2019
- Kind
- Simulated robots
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
In the authors’ words
We present ALFRED (Action Learning From Realistic Environments and Directives), a benchmark for learning a mapping from natural language instructions and egocentric vision to sequences of actions for household tasks. ALFRED includes long, compositional tasks with non-reversible state changes to shrink the gap between research benchmarks and real-world applications. ALFRED consists of expert demonstrations in interactive visual environments for 25k natural language directives. These directives contain both high-level goals like "Rinse off a mug and place it in the coffee maker." and low-level language instructions like "Walk to the coffee maker on the right." ALFRED tasks are more complex in terms of sequence length, action space, and language than existing vision-and-language task datasets. We show that a baseline model based on recent embodied vision-and-language tasks performs poorly on ALFRED, suggesting that there is significant room for developing innovative grounded visual language understanding models with this benchmark.
GRL tops the leaderboard with 68.5%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 68.5 GRL
- 65.5 PACE-Agent
- 62.4 EPO
- 62.0 RoboGPT
- 60.8 SCOUT
- 60.7 RLEF
- 60.2 DISCO+
- 59.6 CSL-HDP(version1)
- 58.1 LOAT
- 57.8 ThinkBot-unseen
- 57.5 HDP
- 56.5 DISCO
- 53.8 DISCO++
- 50.8 REIF
- 50.8 SDPA
- 50.4 [EAI23] ECLAIR
- 48.6 ESP - 2
- 48.5 ESP
- 47.5 Container
- 47.2 DRL
- 45.7 Prompter
- 45.3 Prompter, no slice replay
- 43.7 high level only
- 41.2 AGR-GPT4o
- 40.9 FLARE
- 39.2 HD-Agent
- 38.5 HIA-High-Goal-Only
- 38.2 EI2
- 36.1 [EAI22] EPA
- 35.8 Obstacle_film
- 35.6 zero-shot-LLM
- 35.4 [EAI22] LGS-RPA
- 35.4 ICL-GPT3
- 34.1 LGS-RPA
- 32.2 alfred-bot
- 29.2 726
- 28.7 EA-LLM
- 28.3 [EAI22] Sudoer-SRCB-RMU
- 27.8 FILM - a new semantic policy instance
- 26.5 FILM
- 26.2 ABP
- 24.3 LEBP
- 23.5 AMSLAM
- 22.2 FIQA
- 21.8 HLSM-MAT
- 20.3 HLSM
- 17.9 ECL
- 17.7 FILM_smart
- 17.2 CLET
- 16.3 [EAI21] - HLSM
- 16.3 VLNBERT-L + M-Track
- 15.4 [EAI21] ABP
- 13.9 [EAI21] HiTUT
- 13.3 LSTM-L + M-Track
- 9.42 [EAI21] LWIT
- 8.57 Episodic Transformer (E.T.)
- 7.52 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] + nav_receptacle
- 6.56 ORL
- 6.38 LAV
- 6.06 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0]
- 5.62 [EAI 21] SRCB-sudoer
- 5.36 holiday
- 5.30 MOCA
- 5.30 SRCB-sudoer
- 5.05 [EAI 2021] EmBERT
- 4.45 ECCV 2020 Winner
- 3.14 EmBERT
- 1.50 Baseline Seq2Seq + Progress Monitoring + Two stage mask prediction
- 0.85 ALFRED Speaks - Augmented Agent
- 0.66 Baseline + ImprovedMask
- 0.53 ALFS2S
- 0.39 Baseline Seq2Seq+PM (both)
- 0.33 baseline v2
- 0.26 Baseline_v2
- 0.26 mytest_raw
- 0.21 Seq2Seq
- 0.20 submission_GRN
- 0.20 DDDDDDD
- 0.20 baseline
- 0.20 submission_GRN2
- 0.20 baseline_ggg
- 0.20 test_baseline_smr
- 0.20 baseline_bronze
- 0.20 Baseline
- 0.20 Baseline_Test_Unseen
- 0.20 test
- 0.20 test-SLAM
- 0.0 ThinkBot_seen
- 1 GRL 68.5%
- 2 PACE-Agent 65.5%
- 3 EPO 62.4%
- 4 RoboGPT 62%
- 5 SCOUT 60.8%
- 6 RLEF 60.7%
- 7 DISCO+ 60.2%
- 8 CSL-HDP(version1) 59.6%
- 9 LOAT 58.1%
- 10 ThinkBot-unseen 57.8%
- 11 HDP 57.5%
- 12 DISCO 56.5%
- 13 DISCO++ 53.8%
- 14 REIF 50.8%
- 15 SDPA 50.8%
- 16 [EAI23] ECLAIR 50.4%
- 17 ESP - 2 48.6%
- 18 ESP 48.5%
- 19 Container 47.5%
- 20 DRL 47.2%
- 21 Prompter 45.7%
- 22 Prompter, no slice replay 45.3%
- 23 high level only 43.7%
- 24 AGR-GPT4o 41.2%
- 25 FLARE 40.9%
- 26 HD-Agent 39.2%
- 27 HIA-High-Goal-Only 38.5%
- 28 EI2 38.2%
- 29 [EAI22] EPA 36.1%
- 30 Obstacle_film 35.8%
- 31 zero-shot-LLM 35.6%
- 32 [EAI22] LGS-RPA 35.4%
- 33 ICL-GPT3 35.4%
- 34 LGS-RPA 34.1%
- 35 alfred-bot 32.2%
- 36 726 29.2%
- 37 EA-LLM 28.7%
- 38 [EAI22] Sudoer-SRCB-RMU 28.3%
- 39 FILM - a new semantic policy instance 27.8%
- 40 FILM 26.5%
- 41 ABP 26.2%
- 42 LEBP 24.3%
- 43 AMSLAM 23.5%
- 44 FIQA 22.2%
- 45 HLSM-MAT 21.8%
- 46 HLSM 20.3%
- 47 ECL 17.9%
- 48 FILM_smart 17.7%
- 49 CLET 17.2%
- 50 [EAI21] - HLSM 16.3%
- 51 VLNBERT-L + M-Track 16.3%
- 52 [EAI21] ABP 15.4%
- 53 [EAI21] HiTUT 13.9%
- 54 LSTM-L + M-Track 13.3%
- 55 [EAI21] LWIT 9.42%
- 56 Episodic Transformer (E.T.) 8.57%
- 57 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] + nav_receptacle 7.52%
- 58 ORL 6.56%
- 59 LAV 6.38%
- 60 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] 6.06%
- 61 [EAI 21] SRCB-sudoer 5.62%
- 62 holiday 5.36%
- 63 MOCA 5.30%
- 64 SRCB-sudoer 5.30%
- 65 [EAI 2021] EmBERT 5.05%
- 66 ECCV 2020 Winner 4.45%
- 67 EmBERT 3.14%
- 68 Baseline Seq2Seq + Progress Monitoring + Two stage mask prediction 1.50%
- 69 ALFRED Speaks - Augmented Agent 0.85%
- 70 Baseline + ImprovedMask 0.66%
- 71 ALFS2S 0.53%
- 72 Baseline Seq2Seq+PM (both) 0.39%
- 73 baseline v2 0.33%
- 74 Baseline_v2 0.26%
- 75 mytest_raw 0.26%
- 76 Seq2Seq 0.21%
- 77 submission_GRN 0.20%
- 78 DDDDDDD 0.20%
- 79 baseline 0.20%
- 80 submission_GRN2 0.20%
- 81 baseline_ggg 0.20%
- 82 test_baseline_smr 0.20%
- 83 baseline_bronze 0.20%
- 84 Baseline 0.20%
- 85 Baseline_Test_Unseen 0.20%
- 86 test 0.20%
- 87 test-SLAM 0.20%
- 88 ThinkBot_seen 0%
Source: Official ALFRED leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRL | 68.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | PACE-Agent | 65.5% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | EPO | 62.4% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | RoboGPT | 62% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | SCOUT | 60.8% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | RLEF | 60.7% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | DISCO+ | 60.2% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | CSL-HDP(version1) | 59.6% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | LOAT | 58.1% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | ThinkBot-unseen | 57.8% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | HDP | 57.5% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | DISCO | 56.5% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | DISCO++ | 53.8% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | REIF | 50.8% | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | SDPA | 50.8% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | [EAI23] ECLAIR | 50.4% | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | ESP - 2 | 48.6% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | ESP | 48.5% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Container | 47.5% | May 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | DRL | 47.2% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Prompter | 45.7% | Aug 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Prompter, no slice replay | 45.3% | Feb 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | high level only | 43.7% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | AGR-GPT4o | 41.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | FLARE | 40.9% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | HD-Agent | 39.2% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | HIA-High-Goal-Only | 38.5% | Feb 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | EI2 | 38.2% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | [EAI22] EPA | 36.1% | May 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Obstacle_film | 35.8% | Dec 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | zero-shot-LLM | 35.6% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | [EAI22] LGS-RPA | 35.4% | Feb 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | ICL-GPT3 | 35.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | LGS-RPA | 34.1% | Jan 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | alfred-bot | 32.2% | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | 726 | 29.2% | Nov 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | EA-LLM | 28.7% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | [EAI22] Sudoer-SRCB-RMU | 28.3% | May 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | FILM - a new semantic policy instance | 27.8% | Feb 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | FILM | 26.5% | Sep 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | ABP | 26.2% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | LEBP | 24.3% | Mar 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | AMSLAM | 23.5% | Sep 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | FIQA | 22.2% | Jun 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | HLSM-MAT | 21.8% | Dec 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | HLSM | 20.3% | Oct 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | ECL | 17.9% | Jun 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | FILM_smart | 17.7% | Dec 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | CLET | 17.2% | Nov 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | [EAI21] - HLSM | 16.3% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | VLNBERT-L + M-Track | 16.3% | Mar 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | [EAI21] ABP | 15.4% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | [EAI21] HiTUT | 13.9% | Jan 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | LSTM-L + M-Track | 13.3% | Mar 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | [EAI21] LWIT | 9.42% | Jan 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | Episodic Transformer (E.T.) | 8.57% | Feb 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] + nav_receptacle | 7.52% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | ORL | 6.56% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | LAV | 6.38% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] | 6.06% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | [EAI 21] SRCB-sudoer | 5.62% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | holiday | 5.36% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | MOCA | 5.30% | Oct 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | SRCB-sudoer | 5.30% | Mar 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | [EAI 2021] EmBERT | 5.05% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | ECCV 2020 Winner | 4.45% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 67 | EmBERT | 3.14% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 68 | Baseline Seq2Seq + Progress Monitoring + Two stage mask prediction | 1.50% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 69 | ALFRED Speaks - Augmented Agent | 0.85% | Oct 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 70 | Baseline + ImprovedMask | 0.66% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 71 | ALFS2S | 0.53% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 72 | Baseline Seq2Seq+PM (both) | 0.39% | Mar 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 73 | baseline v2 | 0.33% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 74 | Baseline_v2 | 0.26% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 75 | mytest_raw | 0.26% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 76 | Seq2Seq | 0.21% | Oct 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 77 | submission_GRN | 0.20% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 78 | DDDDDDD | 0.20% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 79 | baseline | 0.20% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 80 | submission_GRN2 | 0.20% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 81 | baseline_ggg | 0.20% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 82 | test_baseline_smr | 0.20% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 83 | baseline_bronze | 0.20% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 84 | Baseline | 0.20% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 85 | Baseline_Test_Unseen | 0.20% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 86 | test | 0.20% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 87 | test-SLAM | 0.20% | Sep 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 88 | ThinkBot_seen | 0% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%