Benchmark Almanac

ALFRED

GRL 68.5% tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Agents follow natural-language instructions to finish household tasks in the AI2-THOR simulator from first-person views, such as rinsing a mug and putting it in the coffee maker. The benchmark has expert demonstrations for 25,000 directives with both high-level goals and step-by-step instructions. Scores count tasks completed and goal conditions met in seen and unseen rooms.

The test sets are scored on the maker's leaderboard, which lists about 90 entries. Many entries are trained policies rather than language models. EmbodiedBench's EB-ALFRED adapts these tasks for multimodal models and is cataloged inside embodiedbench. About 530 GitHub stars.

Released
December 2019
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set

In the authors’ words

We present ALFRED (Action Learning From Realistic Environments and Directives), a benchmark for learning a mapping from natural language instructions and egocentric vision to sequences of actions for household tasks. ALFRED includes long, compositional tasks with non-reversible state changes to shrink the gap between research benchmarks and real-world applications. ALFRED consists of expert demonstrations in interactive visual environments for 25k natural language directives. These directives contain both high-level goals like "Rinse off a mug and place it in the coffee maker." and low-level language instructions like "Walk to the coffee maker on the right." ALFRED tasks are more complex in terms of sequence length, action space, and language than existing vision-and-language task datasets. We show that a baseline model based on recent embodied vision-and-language tasks performs poorly on ALFRED, suggesting that there is significant room for developing innovative grounded visual language understanding models with this benchmark.

Abstract of ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks (arXiv:1912.01734, CC0)
88
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

GRL tops the leaderboard with 68.5%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

88 entries. Scroll sideways for the rest.

  1. 68.5 GRL
  2. 65.5 PACE-Agent
  3. 62.4 EPO
  4. 62.0 RoboGPT
  5. 60.8 SCOUT
  6. 60.7 RLEF
  7. 60.2 DISCO+
  8. 59.6 CSL-HDP(version1)
  9. 58.1 LOAT
  10. 57.8 ThinkBot-unseen
  11. 57.5 HDP
  12. 56.5 DISCO
  13. 53.8 DISCO++
  14. 50.8 REIF
  15. 50.8 SDPA
  16. 50.4 [EAI23] ECLAIR
  17. 48.6 ESP - 2
  18. 48.5 ESP
  19. 47.5 Container
  20. 47.2 DRL
  21. 45.7 Prompter
  22. 45.3 Prompter, no slice replay
  23. 43.7 high level only
  24. 41.2 AGR-GPT4o
  25. 40.9 FLARE
  26. 39.2 HD-Agent
  27. 38.5 HIA-High-Goal-Only
  28. 38.2 EI2
  29. 36.1 [EAI22] EPA
  30. 35.8 Obstacle_film
  31. 35.6 zero-shot-LLM
  32. 35.4 [EAI22] LGS-RPA
  33. 35.4 ICL-GPT3
  34. 34.1 LGS-RPA
  35. 32.2 alfred-bot
  36. 29.2 726
  37. 28.7 EA-LLM
  38. 28.3 [EAI22] Sudoer-SRCB-RMU
  39. 27.8 FILM - a new semantic policy instance
  40. 26.5 FILM
  41. 26.2 ABP
  42. 24.3 LEBP
  43. 23.5 AMSLAM
  44. 22.2 FIQA
  45. 21.8 HLSM-MAT
  46. 20.3 HLSM
  47. 17.9 ECL
  48. 17.7 FILM_smart
  49. 17.2 CLET
  50. 16.3 [EAI21] - HLSM
  51. 16.3 VLNBERT-L + M-Track
  52. 15.4 [EAI21] ABP
  53. 13.9 [EAI21] HiTUT
  54. 13.3 LSTM-L + M-Track
  55. 9.42 [EAI21] LWIT
  56. 8.57 Episodic Transformer (E.T.)
  57. 7.52 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] + nav_receptacle
  58. 6.56 ORL
  59. 6.38 LAV
  60. 6.06 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0]
  61. 5.62 [EAI 21] SRCB-sudoer
  62. 5.36 holiday
  63. 5.30 MOCA
  64. 5.30 SRCB-sudoer
  65. 5.05 [EAI 2021] EmBERT
  66. 4.45 ECCV 2020 Winner
  67. 3.14 EmBERT
  68. 1.50 Baseline Seq2Seq + Progress Monitoring + Two stage mask prediction
  69. 0.85 ALFRED Speaks - Augmented Agent
  70. 0.66 Baseline + ImprovedMask
  71. 0.53 ALFS2S
  72. 0.39 Baseline Seq2Seq+PM (both)
  73. 0.33 baseline v2
  74. 0.26 Baseline_v2
  75. 0.26 mytest_raw
  76. 0.21 Seq2Seq
  77. 0.20 submission_GRN
  78. 0.20 DDDDDDD
  79. 0.20 baseline
  80. 0.20 submission_GRN2
  81. 0.20 baseline_ggg
  82. 0.20 test_baseline_smr
  83. 0.20 baseline_bronze
  84. 0.20 Baseline
  85. 0.20 Baseline_Test_Unseen
  86. 0.20 test
  87. 0.20 test-SLAM
  88. 0.0 ThinkBot_seen
  1. 1 GRL 68.5%
  2. 2 PACE-Agent 65.5%
  3. 3 EPO 62.4%
  4. 4 RoboGPT 62%
  5. 5 SCOUT 60.8%
  6. 6 RLEF 60.7%
  7. 7 DISCO+ 60.2%
  8. 8 CSL-HDP(version1) 59.6%
  9. 9 LOAT 58.1%
  10. 10 ThinkBot-unseen 57.8%
  11. 11 HDP 57.5%
  12. 12 DISCO 56.5%
  13. 13 DISCO++ 53.8%
  14. 14 REIF 50.8%
  15. 15 SDPA 50.8%
  16. 16 [EAI23] ECLAIR 50.4%
  17. 17 ESP - 2 48.6%
  18. 18 ESP 48.5%
  19. 19 Container 47.5%
  20. 20 DRL 47.2%
  21. 21 Prompter 45.7%
  22. 22 Prompter, no slice replay 45.3%
  23. 23 high level only 43.7%
  24. 24 AGR-GPT4o 41.2%
  25. 25 FLARE 40.9%
  26. 26 HD-Agent 39.2%
  27. 27 HIA-High-Goal-Only 38.5%
  28. 28 EI2 38.2%
  29. 29 [EAI22] EPA 36.1%
  30. 30 Obstacle_film 35.8%
  31. 31 zero-shot-LLM 35.6%
  32. 32 [EAI22] LGS-RPA 35.4%
  33. 33 ICL-GPT3 35.4%
  34. 34 LGS-RPA 34.1%
  35. 35 alfred-bot 32.2%
  36. 36 726 29.2%
  37. 37 EA-LLM 28.7%
  38. 38 [EAI22] Sudoer-SRCB-RMU 28.3%
  39. 39 FILM - a new semantic policy instance 27.8%
  40. 40 FILM 26.5%
  41. 41 ABP 26.2%
  42. 42 LEBP 24.3%
  43. 43 AMSLAM 23.5%
  44. 44 FIQA 22.2%
  45. 45 HLSM-MAT 21.8%
  46. 46 HLSM 20.3%
  47. 47 ECL 17.9%
  48. 48 FILM_smart 17.7%
  49. 49 CLET 17.2%
  50. 50 [EAI21] - HLSM 16.3%
  51. 51 VLNBERT-L + M-Track 16.3%
  52. 52 [EAI21] ABP 15.4%
  53. 53 [EAI21] HiTUT 13.9%
  54. 54 LSTM-L + M-Track 13.3%
  55. 55 [EAI21] LWIT 9.42%
  56. 56 Episodic Transformer (E.T.) 8.57%
  57. 57 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] + nav_receptacle 7.52%
  58. 58 ORL 6.56%
  59. 59 LAV 6.38%
  60. 60 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] 6.06%
  61. 61 [EAI 21] SRCB-sudoer 5.62%
  62. 62 holiday 5.36%
  63. 63 MOCA 5.30%
  64. 64 SRCB-sudoer 5.30%
  65. 65 [EAI 2021] EmBERT 5.05%
  66. 66 ECCV 2020 Winner 4.45%
  67. 67 EmBERT 3.14%
  68. 68 Baseline Seq2Seq + Progress Monitoring + Two stage mask prediction 1.50%
  69. 69 ALFRED Speaks - Augmented Agent 0.85%
  70. 70 Baseline + ImprovedMask 0.66%
  71. 71 ALFS2S 0.53%
  72. 72 Baseline Seq2Seq+PM (both) 0.39%
  73. 73 baseline v2 0.33%
  74. 74 Baseline_v2 0.26%
  75. 75 mytest_raw 0.26%
  76. 76 Seq2Seq 0.21%
  77. 77 submission_GRN 0.20%
  78. 78 DDDDDDD 0.20%
  79. 79 baseline 0.20%
  80. 80 submission_GRN2 0.20%
  81. 81 baseline_ggg 0.20%
  82. 82 test_baseline_smr 0.20%
  83. 83 baseline_bronze 0.20%
  84. 84 Baseline 0.20%
  85. 85 Baseline_Test_Unseen 0.20%
  86. 86 test 0.20%
  87. 87 test-SLAM 0.20%
  88. 88 ThinkBot_seen 0%

Source: Official ALFRED leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GRL 68.5% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
2 PACE-Agent 65.5% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 EPO 62.4% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
4 RoboGPT 62% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
5 SCOUT 60.8% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
6 RLEF 60.7% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
7 DISCO+ 60.2% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
8 CSL-HDP(version1) 59.6% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
9 LOAT 58.1% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
10 ThinkBot-unseen 57.8% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
11 HDP 57.5% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
12 DISCO 56.5% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
13 DISCO++ 53.8% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
14 REIF 50.8% Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
15 SDPA 50.8% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
16 [EAI23] ECLAIR 50.4% Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
17 ESP - 2 48.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
18 ESP 48.5% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Container 47.5% May 2023 Official leaderboard
20 DRL 47.2% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
21 Prompter 45.7% Aug 2022 Official leaderboard
22 Prompter, no slice replay 45.3% Feb 2023 Official leaderboard
23 high level only 43.7% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
24 AGR-GPT4o 41.2% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
25 FLARE 40.9% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
26 HD-Agent 39.2% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
27 HIA-High-Goal-Only 38.5% Feb 2023 Official leaderboard
28 EI2 38.2% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
29 [EAI22] EPA 36.1% May 2022 Official leaderboard
30 Obstacle_film 35.8% Dec 2022 Official leaderboard
31 zero-shot-LLM 35.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
32 [EAI22] LGS-RPA 35.4% Feb 2022 Official leaderboard
33 ICL-GPT3 35.4% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
34 LGS-RPA 34.1% Jan 2022 Official leaderboard
35 alfred-bot 32.2% Mar 2023 Official leaderboard
36 726 29.2% Nov 2022 Official leaderboard
37 EA-LLM 28.7% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
38 [EAI22] Sudoer-SRCB-RMU 28.3% May 2022 Official leaderboard
39 FILM - a new semantic policy instance 27.8% Feb 2022 Official leaderboard
40 FILM 26.5% Sep 2021 Official leaderboard
41 ABP 26.2% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
42 LEBP 24.3% Mar 2022 Official leaderboard
43 AMSLAM 23.5% Sep 2021 Official leaderboard
44 FIQA 22.2% Jun 2022 Official leaderboard
45 HLSM-MAT 21.8% Dec 2021 Official leaderboard
46 HLSM 20.3% Oct 2021 Official leaderboard
47 ECL 17.9% Jun 2022 Official leaderboard
48 FILM_smart 17.7% Dec 2022 Official leaderboard
49 CLET 17.2% Nov 2021 Official leaderboard
50 [EAI21] - HLSM 16.3% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
51 VLNBERT-L + M-Track 16.3% Mar 2022 Official leaderboard
52 [EAI21] ABP 15.4% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
53 [EAI21] HiTUT 13.9% Jan 2021 Official leaderboard
54 LSTM-L + M-Track 13.3% Mar 2022 Official leaderboard
55 [EAI21] LWIT 9.42% Jan 2021 Official leaderboard
56 Episodic Transformer (E.T.) 8.57% Feb 2021 Official leaderboard
57 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] + nav_receptacle 7.52% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
58 ORL 6.56% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
59 LAV 6.38% May 2021 Official leaderboard
60 EmBERT [36_18_18_18-horizon0] 6.06% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
61 [EAI 21] SRCB-sudoer 5.62% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
62 holiday 5.36% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
63 MOCA 5.30% Oct 2020 Official leaderboard
64 SRCB-sudoer 5.30% Mar 2021 Official leaderboard
65 [EAI 2021] EmBERT 5.05% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
66 ECCV 2020 Winner 4.45% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
67 EmBERT 3.14% May 2021 Official leaderboard
68 Baseline Seq2Seq + Progress Monitoring + Two stage mask prediction 1.50% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
69 ALFRED Speaks - Augmented Agent 0.85% Oct 2020 Official leaderboard
70 Baseline + ImprovedMask 0.66% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
71 ALFS2S 0.53% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
72 Baseline Seq2Seq+PM (both) 0.39% Mar 2020 Official leaderboard
73 baseline v2 0.33% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
74 Baseline_v2 0.26% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
75 mytest_raw 0.26% May 2024 Official leaderboard
76 Seq2Seq 0.21% Oct 2022 Official leaderboard
77 submission_GRN 0.20% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
78 DDDDDDD 0.20% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
79 baseline 0.20% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
80 submission_GRN2 0.20% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
81 baseline_ggg 0.20% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
82 test_baseline_smr 0.20% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
83 baseline_bronze 0.20% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
84 Baseline 0.20% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
85 Baseline_Test_Unseen 0.20% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
86 test 0.20% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
87 test-SLAM 0.20% Sep 2021 Official leaderboard
88 ThinkBot_seen 0% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 103 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%