Benchmark Almanac

AIRTBench

Claude 3.7 Sonnet 46.9% leads since June 2025
Not in model cards

Models act as autonomous AI red teamers on 70 black-box capture-the-flag challenges from Dreadnode's Crucible platform. Each challenge hides a flag behind an AI or ML system, and the model writes Python code to attack it with methods such as prompt injection, evasion and model inversion. A challenge counts as solved when the model submits the correct flag.

The paper reports both the share of challenges solved and the overall success rate across attempts, which differ a lot. Models do much better on prompt injection than on system exploitation and model inversion. About 110 GitHub stars.

Made by
Dreadnode
Released
June 2025
Kind
Capture-the-flag challenges
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last model added
May 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce AIRTBench, an AI red teaming benchmark for evaluating language models' ability to autonomously discover and exploit Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML) security vulnerabilities. The benchmark consists of 70 realistic black-box capture-the-flag (CTF) challenges from the Crucible challenge environment on the Dreadnode platform, requiring models to write python code to interact with and compromise AI systems. Claude-3.7-Sonnet emerged as the clear leader, solving 43 challenges (61% of the total suite, 46.9% overall success rate), with Gemini-2.5-Pro following at 39 challenges (56%, 34.3% overall), GPT-4.5-Preview at 34 challenges (49%, 36.9% overall), and DeepSeek R1 at 29 challenges (41%, 26.9% overall). Our evaluations show frontier models excel at prompt injection attacks (averaging 49% success rates) but struggle with system exploitation and model inversion challenges (below 26%, even for the best performers). Frontier models are far outpacing open-source alternatives, with the best truly open-source model (Llama-4-17B) solving 7 challenges (10%, 1.0% overall), though demonstrating specialized capabilities on certain hard challenges. Compared to human security researchers, large language models (LLMs) solve challenges with remarkable efficiency completing in minutes what typically takes humans hours or days-with efficiency advantages of over 5,000x on hard challenges. Our contribution fills a critical gap in the evaluation landscape, providing the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to measure and track progress in autonomous AI red teaming capabilities.

Abstract of AIRTBench: Measuring Autonomous AI Red Teaming Capabilities in Language Models (arXiv:2506.14682, CC0)
12
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 46.9% among models released by May 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in May 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet Released runs; flag found 46.9%
  2. 2 GPT-4.5 Released runs; flag found 36.9%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025, Released runs; flag found 34.3%
  4. 4 o3-mini Released runs; flag found 28.4%
  5. 5 DeepSeek-R1 [snapshot unspecified] Released runs; flag found 26.9%
  6. 6 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025, Released runs; flag found 26.4%
  7. 7 gpt-4o [snapshot unspecified] Released runs; flag found 20.3%
  8. 8 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025, Released runs; flag found 16.9%
  9. 9 gemini-1.5-pro [snapshot unspecified] Released runs; flag found 15.1%
  10. 10 Llama 4 Scout Released runs; flag found 1.00%
  11. 11 QwQ-32B Released runs; flag found 0.57%
  12. 12 Llama 3.3 70B Released runs; flag found 0%

Source: Official AIRTBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 46.9% Released runs; flag found Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4.5 36.9% Released runs; flag found Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 34.3% Released runs; flag found, gemini May 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o3-mini 28.4% Released runs; flag found, openai Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-R1 [snapshot unspecified] 26.9% Released runs; flag found, together_ai/deepseek-ai Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 26.4% Released runs; flag found, gemini Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 gpt-4o [snapshot unspecified] 20.3% Released runs; flag found, openai Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 16.9% Released runs; flag found, gemini Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 gemini-1.5-pro [snapshot unspecified] 15.1% Released runs; flag found, gemini Official leaderboard
10 Llama 4 Scout 1.00% Released runs; flag found, groq/meta-llama Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 QwQ-32B 0.57% Released runs; flag found, groq Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Llama 3.3 70B 0% Released runs; flag found, groq Dec 2024 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2025

Source: Official AIRTBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet o3-mini Llama 3.3 70B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet o3-mini

Source: Official AIRTBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%