AgentBoard
LLM agents act in 9 partially observable, multi-turn environments that cover embodied tasks, games, web browsing and tool use. Besides final success, AgentBoard reports a progress rate, the share of annotated subgoals the agent reaches. An open toolkit breaks results down by skill.
The 9 environments adapt existing tasks such as AlfWorld, ScienceWorld, BabyAI, WebShop and WebArena, with new subgoal annotations. NeurIPS 2024 Datasets and Benchmarks track. About 450 GitHub stars. The repository was last updated in 2024-05, so the leaderboard holds older models.
- Made by
- HKUST NLP and collaborators
- Released
- January 2024
- Kind
- General assistants
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 2 #191 on the capability index
- Last model added
- September 2023
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) as general-purpose agents is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. However, the evaluation process presents substantial challenges. A primary obstacle is the benchmarking of agent performance across diverse scenarios within a unified framework, especially in maintaining partially-observable environments and ensuring multi-round interactions. Moreover, current evaluation frameworks mostly focus on the final success rate, revealing few insights during the process and failing to provide a deep understanding of the model abilities. To address these challenges, we introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents. AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit that features easy assessment of agents for multi-faceted analysis. This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront. Ultimately, AgentBoard serves as a step towards demystifying agent behaviors and accelerating the development of stronger LLM agents.
GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 70%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 2, at 48.9%.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2023, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) 70%
- 2 Claude 2 48.9%
- 3 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 41.4%
- 4 DeepSeek-67b 38.5%
- 5 Text-Davinci-003 37.2%
- 6 GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k 34.2%
- 7 Lemur-70b 30.8%
- 8 CodeLlama-34b 30%
- 9 CodeLlama-13b 25.8%
- 10
Mistral 7B v0.1 24.6%
- 11
Llama 2-70B 23.8%
- 12 Vicuna-13b-16k 23.1%
- 13
Llama 2-13B 18.9%
Source: Official AgentBoard leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) | 70% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Claude 2 | 48.9% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 41.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | DeepSeek-67b | 38.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Text-Davinci-003 | 37.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k | 34.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Lemur-70b | 30.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | CodeLlama-34b | 30% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | CodeLlama-13b | 25.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 24.6% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 23.8% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Vicuna-13b-16k | 23.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 18.9% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official AgentBoard leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official AgentBoard leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%