Benchmark Almanac

AgentBoard

GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) 70% tops its leaderboard Claude 2 48.9% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

LLM agents act in 9 partially observable, multi-turn environments that cover embodied tasks, games, web browsing and tool use. Besides final success, AgentBoard reports a progress rate, the share of annotated subgoals the agent reaches. An open toolkit breaks results down by skill.

The 9 environments adapt existing tasks such as AlfWorld, ScienceWorld, BabyAI, WebShop and WebArena, with new subgoal annotations. NeurIPS 2024 Datasets and Benchmarks track. About 450 GitHub stars. The repository was last updated in 2024-05, so the leaderboard holds older models.

Made by
HKUST NLP and collaborators
Released
January 2024
Kind
General assistants
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 2 #191 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2023
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) as general-purpose agents is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. However, the evaluation process presents substantial challenges. A primary obstacle is the benchmarking of agent performance across diverse scenarios within a unified framework, especially in maintaining partially-observable environments and ensuring multi-round interactions. Moreover, current evaluation frameworks mostly focus on the final success rate, revealing few insights during the process and failing to provide a deep understanding of the model abilities. To address these challenges, we introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents. AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit that features easy assessment of agents for multi-faceted analysis. This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront. Ultimately, AgentBoard serves as a step towards demystifying agent behaviors and accelerating the development of stronger LLM agents.

Abstract of AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents (arXiv:2401.13178, CC0)
13
Entries on its own leaderboard, 4 models we track

GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 70%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 2, at 48.9%.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2023, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) 70%
  2. 2 Claude 2 48.9%
  3. 3 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 41.4%
  4. 4 DeepSeek-67b 38.5%
  5. 5 Text-Davinci-003 37.2%
  6. 6 GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k 34.2%
  7. 7 Lemur-70b 30.8%
  8. 8 CodeLlama-34b 30%
  9. 9 CodeLlama-13b 25.8%
  10. 10 Mistral 7B v0.1 24.6%
  11. 11 Llama 2-70B 23.8%
  12. 12 Vicuna-13b-16k 23.1%
  13. 13 Llama 2-13B 18.9%

Source: Official AgentBoard leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) 70% Official leaderboard
2 Claude 2 48.9% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 41.4% Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-67b 38.5% Official leaderboard
5 Text-Davinci-003 37.2% Official leaderboard
6 GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k 34.2% Official leaderboard
7 Lemur-70b 30.8% Official leaderboard
8 CodeLlama-34b 30% Official leaderboard
9 CodeLlama-13b 25.8% Official leaderboard
10 Mistral 7B v0.1 24.6% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
11 Llama 2-70B 23.8% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
12 Vicuna-13b-16k 23.1% Official leaderboard
13 Llama 2-13B 18.9% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jan 2024
Claude 2 48.9%

Source: Official AgentBoard leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 2

Source: Official AgentBoard leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%