Benchmark Almanac

Act2Answer

Magma 72% tops its leaderboard GR00T N1.7 68% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Vision-language-action models answer commonsense and world-knowledge questions by acting. Each question becomes a short tabletop episode, and the robot answers by placing an object on one of the candidate answers. The score is the success rate per knowledge category, which reduces the effect of weak low-level control.

It adapts existing VLM knowledge benchmarks to action. The paper compares 7 VLA models with 9 VLM baselines. 77 Hugging Face upvotes and about 15 GitHub stars.

Released
June 2026
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Last model added
April 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Embodied Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are typically obtained by fine-tuning powerful pretrained VLMs on robotics data, yet it is unclear how much commonsense and factual knowledge they retain after adaptation. Failures on knowledge-sensitive tasks are ambiguous, conflating missing knowledge with poor generalization of low-level control. We introduce Act2Answer, a lightweight protocol that adapts VLM knowledge benchmarks to VLA evaluation by requiring agents to answer through action. Each question becomes a short tabletop episode where the agent performs a single object-placement action to select among candidate answers, yielding an action-grounded success rate with reduced control confounds. We curate a test suite of such environments across diverse commonsense and world-knowledge categories and introduce layerwise intent probing to localize answer-relevant information across the VLM backbone and action head. In a large-scale study of 7 VLA models and 9 VLM baselines, we systematically rank models across categories, finding that VLAs show solid performance on simple concepts while exhibiting larger gaps on richer semantic categories relative to their source VLMs, that VQA co-training is associated with better knowledge retention, and that answer-relevant signals peak in middle VLA layers but attenuate in upper layers. Act2Answer is available at https://tttonyalpha.github.io/act2answer/.

Abstract of Does VLA Even Know the Basics? Measuring Commonsense and World Knowledge Retention in Vision-Language-Action Models (arXiv:2606.19297, CC0)
9
Entries on its own leaderboard, 3 models we track

Magma tops the leaderboard with 72%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GR00T N1.7, at 68%.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Magma 72%
  2. 2 GR00T N1.7 68%
  3. 3 Xiaomi-Robotics-R0 62%
  4. 4 X-VLA 58%
  5. 5 RLDX-1 57%
  6. 6 InternVLA-M1 56%
  7. 7 SpatialVLA 56%
  8. 8 OpenVLA 53%
  9. 9 π0 50%

Source: Official Act2Answer leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Magma 72% Official leaderboard
2 GR00T N1.7 68% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Xiaomi-Robotics-R0 62% Official leaderboard
4 X-VLA 58% Official leaderboard
5 RLDX-1 57% Official leaderboard
6 InternVLA-M1 56% Official leaderboard
7 SpatialVLA 56% Official leaderboard
8 OpenVLA 53% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
9 π0 50% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

NVIDIA
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026

Source: Official Act2Answer leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GR00T N1.7 OpenVLA 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GR00T N1.7 OpenVLA

Source: Official Act2Answer leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 103 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%