Benchmark Almanac

ABC Bench Screening Evasion

Muse Spark 1.1 63.2 Only in system cards

Agents complete a computational task on nucleic-acid synthesis screening. One task family of the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark.

Many labs refuse these prompts, so comparison columns are sparse.

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly acquiring capabilities relevant to biological research, from literature synthesis to interpretation of experimental data. Increasingly, LLM agents can also perform in silico biology tasks that previously required experienced human biologists. These emerging AI capabilities offer new opportunities for scientific discovery and biomedical advances, but they also shift the landscape of biosecurity risks. To address this, we introduce the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark (ABC-Bench), a suite of tasks to measure agentic biosecurity-relevant capabilities. ABC-Bench evaluates LLM agents on both benign and dual-use biology tasks: writing code to operate liquid handling robots, designing DNA fragments for in vitro assembly, and evading DNA synthesis screening. These tasks require a combination of biology and software expertise. All tested LLM agents outperformed the median expert human baseliner on all three tasks. Agents performed highly on tasks drawing on published knowledge and well-documented protocols, and more weakly on a task requiring novel bioinformatics reasoning. In three wet-lab validation experiments, we found that OpenAI's o4-mini-high produced scripts that, when run on an OpenTrons liquid handling robot, successfully assembled DNA with expected sequences.

Abstract of ABC-Bench: An Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark for Biosecurity (arXiv:2606.11150, CC0)
Made by SecureBio Released Jun 2026 Hazardous knowledge Last in a system card Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
2
Models scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Muse Spark 1.1 leads with 63.2

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Muse Spark 1.1 63.2
  2. 2 Muse Spark 1.3 47.6
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Muse Spark 1.1 63.2 Jul 2026 Model card
2 Muse Spark 1.3 47.6 Oct 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 2027 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 2027

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Oct 2026 Muse Spark 1.3 system card 47.6 ABC Bench Screening Evasion score, Muse Spark 1.3 (API), refusals excluded (Table 1, Figure 3) Bio and chem risk
12 Oct 2026 Muse Wonder Full model card ABC Bench Screening Evasion, no score printed because of a high refusal rate (CBRN Capability Evaluations table, section 4) Bio and chem risk
9 Jul 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 63.2 ABC Bench (Screening Evasion), Muse Spark 1.1 Helpful (Table 1, Figure 4) Bio and chem risk

More in Biology and chemistry

All 96 in Biology and chemistry
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. Intern-S2-397B 62.4%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
  • BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference. Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%