ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot
Agents use biology tools to plan liquid-handling robot steps for a construct-assembly task. One task family of the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark.
Part of SecureBio ABC Bench with Fragment Design and Screening Evasion.
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly acquiring capabilities relevant to biological research, from literature synthesis to interpretation of experimental data. Increasingly, LLM agents can also perform in silico biology tasks that previously required experienced human biologists. These emerging AI capabilities offer new opportunities for scientific discovery and biomedical advances, but they also shift the landscape of biosecurity risks. To address this, we introduce the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark (ABC-Bench), a suite of tasks to measure agentic biosecurity-relevant capabilities. ABC-Bench evaluates LLM agents on both benign and dual-use biology tasks: writing code to operate liquid handling robots, designing DNA fragments for in vitro assembly, and evading DNA synthesis screening. These tasks require a combination of biology and software expertise. All tested LLM agents outperformed the median expert human baseliner on all three tasks. Agents performed highly on tasks drawing on published knowledge and well-documented protocols, and more weakly on a task requiring novel bioinformatics reasoning. In three wet-lab validation experiments, we found that OpenAI's o4-mini-high produced scripts that, when run on an OpenTrons liquid handling robot, successfully assembled DNA with expected sequences.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Muse Wonder Full leads with 100.0
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1
Muse Wonder Full 100.0
- 2
Muse Spark 1.3 95.2
- 3
Muse Spark 1.1 93.7
- 4
Muse Spark 92.3
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 100.0 | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 95.2 | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 93.7 | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 92.3 | Jun 2026 | Model card |
3 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
4 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026 | | 95.2 | ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot score, Muse Spark 1.3 (API) (Table 1, Figure 3) | Bio and chem risk |
| 12 Oct 2026 | | 100 | ABC Bench Liquid Handling, printed as 100.0% (CBRN Capability Evaluations table, section 4) | Bio and chem risk |
| 9 Jul 2026 | | 93.7 | ABC Bench (Liquid Handling), Muse Spark 1.1 Helpful (Table 1, Figure 4) | Bio and chem risk |
| 12 Jun 2026 | | 92.3 | ABC Bench (LH) Liquid Handling (Table 1, Figure 4) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
- GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer.
Intern-S2-397B 62.4%
- TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties.
Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
- BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference.
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%