AAV packaging rate auto-research evaluation
Only in system cards
Agents build predictors of AAV capsid packaging that must generalize to an unseen insertion region, using a limited scorer. Scored by Spearman correlation.
Built with Dyno Therapeutics for the CB-2 threshold. Anthropic also reports the share of attempts above 0.52.
Made by Anthropic (with Dyno Therapeutics) Released Sep 2026 Hazardous knowledge Tasks kept private Last in a system card Oct 2026
Last model added Oct 2026
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for AAV packaging rate auto-research evaluation yet.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | AAV packaging rate auto-research evaluation, Spearman correlation over scorer calls, chart without printed values (Figure 2.2.3.3.A) | Bio and chem risk | |
| 28 Sep 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | AAV packaging rate auto-research, Spearman correlation by scorer calls, chart without printed values (2.2.3.3, Figure 2.2.3.3.A) | Bio and chem risk | |
| 22 Sep 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | AAV packaging rate auto-research, Spearman correlation by scorer calls, chart without printed values. Text: reaches 0.50 in fewer than 10 scorer calls, about 60% of attempts exceed the 0.52 threshold (2.2.3.2.3, Figure 2.2.3.2.3.A) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% - GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer.
Intern-S2-397B 62.4% - TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
- BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference.
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%