Benchmark Almanac

Winogender

Gemma 2 9B 79.2% leads since Jul 2024 Only in system cards

Models resolve pronouns in sentences about occupations. Accuracy shows whether gender stereotypes sway coreference.

In the authors’ words

We present an empirical study of gender bias in coreference resolution systems. We first introduce a novel, Winograd schema-style set of minimal pair sentences that differ only by pronoun gender. With these "Winogender schemas," we evaluate and confirm systematic gender bias in three publicly-available coreference resolution systems, and correlate this bias with real-world and textual gender statistics.

Abstract of Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution (arXiv:1804.09301, CC0)
Made by Johns Hopkins University (Rudinger et al.) Released Apr 2018 Bias, fairness and politics All tasks public Last in a system card Jul 2024 Last model added Jul 2024
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemma 2 9B leads with 79.2% among models released by Jun 2024

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemma 2 9B 79.2%
  2. 2 Gemma 2 27B 77.2%
  3. 3 Gemma 7B 54.2%
  4. 4 Gemma 2B 51.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemma 2 9B 79.2% Jul 2024 Model card
2 Gemma 2 27B 77.2% Jul 2024 Model card
3 Gemma 7B 54.2% Mar 2024 Model card
4 Gemma 2B 51.3% Mar 2024 Model card

2 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Lab claims Not tested since Jul 2024
Gemma 2 9B 79.2%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 2 9B Gemma 7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 2 9B Gemma 7B

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
31 Jul 2024 Gemma 2 9B technical report 79.2 Winogender, top-1, IT (Table 18) Bias
31 Jul 2024 Gemma 2 27B technical report 77.2 Winogender, top-1, IT (Table 18) Bias
13 Mar 2024 Gemma 7B technical report 54.2 Winogender, top-1, IT (Table 8) Bias
13 Mar 2024 Gemma 2B technical report 51.3 Winogender, top-1, IT (Table 8) Bias

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%