Benchmark Almanac

WildJailbreak

Falcon H1R 7B 98.5% leads since Jan 2026 Fading

Models face adversarial jailbreak prompts built from in-the-wild tactics, plus benign prompts that look harmful. Evaluations score refusals of harmful requests and compliance with benign ones.

The release is mainly a 262K pair safety training set. Launch posts report its evaluation split.

In the authors’ words

We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics, and then composes multiple tactics for systematic exploration of novel jailbreaks. Compared to prior work that performed red-teaming via recruited human workers, gradient-based optimization, or iterative revision with LLMs, our work investigates jailbreaks from chatbot users who were not specifically instructed to break the system. WildTeaming reveals previously unidentified vulnerabilities of frontier LLMs, resulting in up to 4.6x more diverse and successful adversarial attacks compared to state-of-the-art jailbreak methods. While many datasets exist for jailbreak evaluation, very few open-source datasets exist for jailbreak training, as safety training data has been closed even when model weights are open. With WildTeaming we create WildJailbreak, a large-scale open-source synthetic safety dataset with 262K vanilla (direct request) and adversarial (complex jailbreak) prompt-response pairs. To mitigate exaggerated safety behaviors, WildJailbreak provides two contrastive types of queries: 1) harmful queries (vanilla & adversarial) and 2) benign queries that resemble harmful queries in form but contain no harm. As WildJailbreak considerably upgrades the quality and scale of existing safety resources, it uniquely enables us to examine the scaling effects of data and the interplay of data properties and model capabilities during safety training. Through extensive experiments, we identify the training properties that enable an ideal balance of safety behaviors: appropriate safeguarding without over-refusal, effective handling of vanilla and adversarial queries, and minimal, if any, decrease in general capabilities. All components of WildJailbeak contribute to achieving balanced safety behaviors of models.

Abstract of WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models (arXiv:2406.18510, CC0)
Made by Allen Institute for AI and University of Washington (WildTeaming) Released Jun 2024 Jailbreaks and prompt injection All tasks public Last in a launch post Dec 2025 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Jan 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
2
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
4
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Falcon H1R 7B leads with 98.5%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Falcon H1R 7B 98.5%
  2. 2 K-EXAONE 89.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Falcon H1R 7B 98.5% Jan 2026 Model card
2 K-EXAONE 89.9% Dec 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

LG AI Research Technology Innovation Institute
Lab claims Passed 85% in Dec 2025, by K-EXAONE

The best score passed 85% in Dec 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Falcon H1R 7B K-EXAONE 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Falcon H1R 7B K-EXAONE

Labs headline it less often now, last in Dec 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

LG AI Research
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
31 Dec 2025 K-EXAONE 89.9 Wild-Jailbreak

4 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
5 Jan 2026 Falcon H1R 7B technical report 98.5 AllenAI Wildjailbreak safe rate, CoT+Answer, 98.31 Answer Only, 96.1 CoT Only (Table 10) Robustness
5 Jan 2026 K-EXAONE technical report 89.9 WildJailbreak Safe Rate, Qwen3Guard judge (Table 3, Reasoning mode). Non-reasoning 91.6 (Table 4) Safety
15 Dec 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think technical report WildJailbreak-Test Harmful 25.6 and Benign 99.7, no overall, Final Think 3.0 column (Table 54) Safety
15 Dec 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think technical report WildJailbreak-Test Harmful 71.7 and Benign 92.3, no overall, Final Think 3.1 column (Table 54) Safety

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%