Benchmark Almanac

VWE-Bench

VibeWorlder-30B-A3B 59.3% tops its leaderboard GPT-5.5 57.3% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Multimodal agents build interactive 3D worlds from a user request. They infer intent, plan the scene layout, call 3D tools for asset retrieval, editing and rendering, and revise from rendered feedback. The benchmark has 2,616 3D assets, 323 human-annotated seed worlds and 6,828 queries. Verified queries have ground truth, and the rest are scored with rubrics.

The same release includes VibeWorlding-Gym, an RL post-training framework, so the repository stars (about 259) cover both. 61 Hugging Face upvotes.

Released
August 2026
Kind
CAD models
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.5 #20 on the capability index
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Constructing an interactive 3D open world from a user query is important. However, existing methods are primarily evaluated on idealized, simple queries, making it difficult to systematically analyze and compare how multimodal agents understand user intent, use 3D tools, and reason over textual and visual 3D world information. To this end, we propose VibeWorlding, a unified framework for benchmarking and training vibe worlding agents: a multimodal agent that can autonomously infer user intent, plan scene layout, invoke 3D tools, and reflect on the multimodal feedback in a multi-turn agent-environment interaction process. To achieve this, we first build VWE-BENCH, a benchmark of 2,616 high-quality 3D assets, 323 human-annotated seed 3D worlds, and 6,828 reverse-synthesized multimodal user queries, split into verified queries with ground-truth and unverified queries with carefully designed rubrics. Moreover, we develop VibeWorlding-Gym, a joint multimodal RL post-training framework that integrates (1) a sandbox environment unifying asset retrieval, editing, and image rendering as MCP tools, and (2) a rubric-based verifier that combines physical feasibility and intent fulfillment verification, supporting both fair model evaluation and scalable multimodal RL reward service. Our experiments show that current frontier MLLMs are far from solving the vibe worlding agent task, with even GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.8-Max reaching below 60% success rate, and trace the bottleneck to precise 3D world editing. We further find that RL training can ease this weakness and enable open-source MLLMs to even surpass closed-source frontiers: our VibeWorlder-8B is comparable to frontier MLLMs, while our flagship VibeWorlder-30B-A3B attains the best overall Pass@1 among all evaluated models.

Abstract of VibeWorlding: Can Multimodal Agents Construct 3D Open Worlds End-to-End? (arXiv:2608.15265, CC0)
15
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track

VibeWorlder-30B-A3B tops the leaderboard with 59.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5.5, at 57.3%.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 VibeWorlder-30B-A3B 59.3%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 57.3%
  3. 3 Qwen 3.8 Max 56.9%
  4. 4 Gemini 3.5 Flash 47.4%
  5. 5 Kimi K3 44.5%
  6. 6 Gemini 3.1 Pro 42.7%
  7. 7 VibeWorlder-8B 41.4%
  8. 8 VibeWorlder-30B-A3B-SFT 34.5%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 4.8 24.3%
  10. 10 SceneWeaver 16.3%
  11. 11 SceneAssistant 13.8%
  12. 12 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 13.6%
  13. 13 SAGE 13.6%
  14. 14 VibeWorlder-8B-SFT 12%
  15. 15 Qwen3-VL-8B 5.30%

Source: Official VWE-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 VibeWorlder-30B-A3B 59.3% Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.5 57.3% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen 3.8 Max 56.9% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3.5 Flash 47.4% May 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi K3 44.5% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 3.1 Pro 42.7% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 VibeWorlder-8B 41.4% Official leaderboard
8 VibeWorlder-30B-A3B-SFT 34.5% Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4.8 24.3% May 2026 Official leaderboard
10 SceneWeaver 16.3% Official leaderboard
11 SceneAssistant 13.8% Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 13.6% Official leaderboard
13 SAGE 13.6% Official leaderboard
14 VibeWorlder-8B-SFT 12% Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3-VL-8B 5.30% Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2026
GPT-5.5 57.3%

Source: Official VWE-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro

Source: Official VWE-Bench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Engineering and CAD

All 23 in Engineering and CAD
  • EEBench In use 13 electrical-engineering circuit and PCB design tasks graded by deterministic build checks, simulation and BOM constraints. No LLM judge. Gemini 4 Carbon 83.9%
  • Parametric CAD Bench In use Agents author editable parametric FreeCAD part designs, graded against held-back references for geometry and spec consistency. Claude Opus 5.5 61%
  • 3DCodeBench In use Agentic procedural 3D modeling via code: author engine-ready 3D assets through software APIs. Graded for executability and shape fidelity. LongCat-2.5 55.4%
  • CADGenBench Only in system cards Agents construct CAD models from design prompts. The generation split is graded for executability and geometric correctness. Claude Fable 5 45.1%
  • PartBench Only in system cards Parametric mechanical part design and CAD-style generation, graded for geometric and manufacturing fidelity. Grok 4.6 58.5%
  • LMBuild Not in model cards Language model agents design 3D structures as parts, joints, materials and assembly steps. Scoring checks that the structures can be built and work as intended. GPT-6 Astra 66.5%