Benchmark Almanac

VideoPhy-2

Wan2.1-14B 32.6% tops its leaderboard Sora 23.3% leads the models we track Not in model cards

200 action-centric prompts. Generated videos human-rated for semantic adherence, physical commonsense and physical-rule grounding.

Hard: best model reached only 22% joint performance on the hard subset at release. Conservation laws are a common failure.

In the authors’ words

Large-scale video generative models, capable of creating realistic videos of diverse visual concepts, are strong candidates for general-purpose physical world simulators. However, their adherence to physical commonsense across real-world actions remains unclear (e.g., playing tennis, backflip). Existing benchmarks suffer from limitations such as limited size, lack of human evaluation, sim-to-real gaps, and absence of fine-grained physical rule analysis. To address this, we introduce VideoPhy-2, an action-centric dataset for evaluating physical commonsense in generated videos. We curate 200 diverse actions and detailed prompts for video synthesis from modern generative models. We perform human evaluation that assesses semantic adherence, physical commonsense, and grounding of physical rules in the generated videos. Our findings reveal major shortcomings, with even the best model achieving only 22% joint performance (i.e., high semantic and physical commonsense adherence) on the hard subset of VideoPhy-2. We find that the models particularly struggle with conservation laws like mass and momentum. Finally, we also train VideoPhy-AutoEval, an automatic evaluator for fast, reliable assessment on our dataset. Overall, VideoPhy-2 serves as a rigorous benchmark, exposing critical gaps in video generative models and guiding future research in physically-grounded video generation. The data and code is available at https://videophy2.github.io/.

Abstract of VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generation (arXiv:2503.06800, CC0)
Made by UCLA + Google Released Mar 2025 Physical prediction All tasks public Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Scored
Graded by people Human experts grade or compare the outputs.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
7
Entries on its own leaderboard, 2 models we track

Wan2.1-14B tops the leaderboard with 32.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Sora, at 23.3%.

  1. 1 Wan2.1-14B 32.6%
  2. 2 CogVideoX-5B 25%
  3. 3 Cosmos-Diff-7B 24.1%
  4. 4 Sora 23.3%
  5. 5 Ray2 20.3%
  6. 6 Hunyuan-13B 17.2%
  7. 7 VideoCrafter-2 10.5%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Wan2.1-14B 32.6% Official leaderboard
2 CogVideoX-5B 25% Official leaderboard
3 Cosmos-Diff-7B 24.1% Official leaderboard
4 Sora 23.3% Official leaderboard
5 Ray2 20.3% Official leaderboard
6 Hunyuan-13B 17.2% Official leaderboard
7 VideoCrafter-2 10.5% Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

No dated values yet.

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

More in World models

All 34 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 56.4
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • MVPBench Dropped Models answer video questions on spatial, temporal and intuitive physics. Each question comes in a pair of near-identical videos with opposite answers, so text or single-frame shortcuts fail. gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 72.5%