Benchmark Almanac

Tulu 3 Safety Eval

OLMo 2 1B Instruct 87.6% leads since Apr 2025 Fading

Models answer harmful, jailbreak and benign prompts from several safety benchmarks in Ai2's safety-eval suite. A WildGuard classifier judges the outputs, and the score is an average.

An aggregate used in the Tulu 3 release. The member benchmarks include WildGuardTest, HarmBench and XSTest. Released month taken from the Tulu 3 release.

Made by Ai2 Released Nov 2024 Jailbreaks and prompt injection All tasks public Last in a launch post Apr 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Apr 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
6
Models scored in lab cards
6
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
5
System cards report it, from 1 lab

OLMo 2 1B Instruct leads with 87.6% among models released by Apr 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 87.6%
  2. 2 Tulu 3 405B 86.7%
  3. 3 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 85.9%
  4. 4 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 83.6%
  5. 5 Granite 4.1 30B 78.2%
  6. 6 Olmo 3 32B Think 68.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 87.6% Apr 2025 Model card
2 Tulu 3 405B 86.7% Jan 2025 Model card
3 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 85.9% Mar 2025 Model card
4 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 83.6% Dec 2025 Model card
5 Granite 4.1 30B 78.2% Apr 2026 Model card
6 Olmo 3 32B Think 68.8% Nov 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Ai2
Lab claims Passed 85% in Nov 2024, by Tulu 3 405B

The best score passed 85% in Nov 2024

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) OLMo 2 1B Instruct Tulu 3 405B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) OLMo 2 1B Instruct

Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Ai2
IBM
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
29 Apr 2026 Granite 4.1 30B 78.2 Tulu3 Safety Eval Avg
12 Dec 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 83.6 Safety (Ai2 safety suite average)
20 Nov 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think 68.8 Safety (Ai2 safety suite average)
29 Apr 2025 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 87.6 Safety (Ai2 safety suite average)
13 Mar 2025 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 85.9 Safety (Ai2 safety suite average)
30 Jan 2025 Tulu 3 405B 86.7 Safety (6 task avg.)

5 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
15 Dec 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think technical report 68.8 Safety, average of the Ai2 safety suite, Final Think 3.0 column (Table 14) Safety
15 Dec 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think technical report 83.6 Safety, average of the Ai2 safety suite (Table 14) Safety
8 Oct 2025 OLMo 2 1B Instruct technical report 87.6 Safety (Table 7, Table 23) Safety
31 Dec 2024 OLMo 2 32B Instruct technical report 85.9 Safety, Tulu 3 Safety average (Tables 7 and 16) Safety
22 Nov 2024 Tulu 3 405B technical report 86.7 Safety (6 task avg.), RLVR (Table 4) Safety

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%