Benchmark Almanac

Terminal-Bench 2.1

GPT-6 Astra 87.4% leads since Sep 2026 In use

89 hard terminal tasks across 16 categories in containers. Hidden tests verify the final state. 5 trials per task.

Fixed 28 of the 89 tasks in 2.0. Scores moved by up to 12 points, so the two are kept apart.

In the authors’ words

AI agents may soon become capable of autonomously completing valuable, long-horizon tasks in diverse domains. Current benchmarks either do not measure real-world tasks, or are not sufficiently difficult to meaningfully measure frontier models. To this end, we present Terminal-Bench 2.0: a carefully curated hard benchmark composed of 89 tasks in computer terminal environments inspired by problems from real workflows. Each task features a unique environment, human-written solution, and comprehensive tests for verification. We show that frontier models and agents score less than 65% on the benchmark and conduct an error analysis to identify areas for model and agent improvement. We publish the dataset and evaluation harness to assist developers and researchers in future work at https://www.tbench.ai/ .

Abstract of Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces (arXiv:2601.11868, CC0)
Made by Stanford + Laude Institute Released May 2026 Terminal tasks All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
13
Models scored on its own leaderboard
53
Launch posts list it, from 27 labs
22
System cards report it, from 11 labs

GPT-6 Astra leads with 87.4% among models released by Sep 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra high 87.4%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 xhigh 83.8%
  3. 3 GPT-5.5 xhigh 83.2%
  4. 4 Grok 4.5 high 79.3%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.8 high 78.9%
  6. 6 GPT-5.6 Terra max 78.4%
  7. 7 Muse Spark 1.1 xhigh 76.2%
  8. 8 GPT-5.6 Luna max 75.7%
  9. 9 Claude Sonnet 5 high 74.6%
  10. 10 Gemini 3 Pro high 73.9%
  11. 11 Claude Opus 4.7 max 68.9%
  12. 12 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 65.8%
  13. 13 GLM-5.1 max 58.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 87.4% high, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Fable 5 83.8% xhigh, Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.5 83.2% xhigh, Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Grok 4.5 79.3% high, Cursor CLI Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.8 78.9% high, Claude Code May 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5.6 Terra 78.4% max, Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Muse Spark 1.1 76.2% xhigh, mini-SWE-agent Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5.6 Luna 75.7% max, Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Sonnet 5 74.6% high, Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Gemini 3 Pro 73.9% high, Terminus 2 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Claude Opus 4.7 68.9% max, Claude Code Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 3.1 Pro 65.8% high, Gemini CLI Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
13 GLM-5.1 58.6% max, Claude Code Apr 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 53 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

3 models have held number one since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Anthropic Google DeepMind Cognition
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra 87.4%
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
SWE-2 92.8%

The best score passed 85% in Jun 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) SWE-2 Claude Fable 5 GPT-5.5 Gemini 3 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) SWE-2 GPT-5.5

27 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Anthropic
StepFun
MiniMax
NVIDIA
Z.ai
ByteDance Seed
Tencent
Meituan
Kuaishou
Cognition
OpenAI
Meta
Thinking Machines
xAI
Moonshot AI
Poolside
DeepSeek
LG AI Research
Qwen
Upstage
IBM
Shanghai AI Lab
Xiaomi Corp
Reflection
Ant Group
Liquid AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
27 Oct 2026 LFM3-1.7B 12.9 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (OpenCode)
15 Oct 2026 Muse Spark Open 76.4 Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminus 2 agent
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 51 Terminal-Bench 2.1
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 60.7 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus 2)
13 Oct 2026 Ling-3.1-flash 81.2 Terminal-Bench-2.1
5 Oct 2026 Beam 1.0 80.1 Terminal Bench v2.1
22 Sep 2026 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 89.9 Terminal Bench 2.1
20 Sep 2026 Step 5 Preview 85 Terminal-Bench v2.1
13 Sep 2026 Intern-S2-397B 64 TerminalBench 2.1 (Terminus 2)
10 Sep 2026 SWE-2 92.8 Terminal-Bench 2.1
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 90.6 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Pass@1)
2 Sep 2026 Muse Spark 1.3 88.8 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Agentic terminal coding)
2 Sep 2026 Gemini 3.8 Flash 89.4 Terminal-bench 2.1
28 Aug 2026 Tencent Hy4 preview 85.4 Terminal-Bench 2.1
26 Aug 2026 GLM-5.3-Flash 84.3 Terminal Bench 2.1 (Claude Code 2.1.207)
25 Aug 2026 Granite 4.2 30B 29.2 Terminal-Bench 2.1
21 Aug 2026 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp 83.9 Terminal Bench 2.1
14 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 27B 73 Agentic terminal coding Terminal Bench 2.1 (Terminus)
14 Aug 2026 GLM-5.3 88.2 Terminal Bench 2.1
13 Aug 2026 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 87.9 Terminal Bench 2.1
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash 85.8 Terminal-bench 2.1
11 Aug 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 24.6 Terminal-Bench 2.1
11 Aug 2026 Solar Pro 4 57 Terminal-Bench v2.1 (Artificial Analysis score quoted by Upstage)
10 Aug 2026 Muse Glimmer 51.7 TerminalBench 2.1 (with terminus2)
5 Aug 2026 Muse Spark 1.2 82.9 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Muse Code harness)
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 86.6 Terminal Bench 2.1
31 Jul 2026 K-EXAONE 2.0 43.8 Terminal-Bench 2.1
31 Jul 2026 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 82.7 Terminal Bench 2.1
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small 64.7 Terminal Bench 2.1 (best harness)
23 Jul 2026 KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev 41 Terminal-Bench 2.1, mean of Terminus-2 32.60 / Claude Code 49.44
21 Jul 2026 Laguna S 2.1 70.2 Terminal-Bench 2.1
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 54 Terminal-bench 2.1 (Terminus-2 harness)
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.6 Flash 78 Terminal-bench 2.1 (Terminus-2 harness)
16 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 88.3 Terminal-Bench 2.1
16 Jul 2026 Grok 4.5 83.3 Terminal Bench 2.1
15 Jul 2026 Inkling 63.8 Terminal Bench 2.1 (best harness)
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna 84.7 Terminal-Bench 2.1
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra 87.4 Terminal-Bench 2.1
9 Jul 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 80 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Agentic terminal coding)
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol 91.9 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Sol Ultra, 4 agents)
8 Jul 2026 SWE-1.7 81.5 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Devin CLI, timeout 4h)
6 Jul 2026 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 60.7 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA Coding Index category)
5 Jul 2026 LongCat-2.0 70.8 Terminal-Bench 2.1
2 Jul 2026 Tencent Hy3 71.7 Terminal-Bench 2.1
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 80.4 Agentic coding Terminal-Bench 2.1
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro 71 Terminal Bench 2.1
16 Jun 2026 GLM-5.2 82.7 Terminal Bench 2.1 (Best Reported Harness)
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 88 Agentic coding Terminal-Bench 2.1
4 Jun 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra 56.4 Terminal Bench 2.1
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 66 Terminal Bench 2.1
29 May 2026 Step 3.7 Flash 59.6 Terminal-Bench 2.1
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 74.6 Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1
19 May 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash 76.2 Terminal-bench 2.1 (Terminus-2 harness)

22 system cards report it, from 11 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
19 Oct 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 51.7 TerminalBench 2.1 (Terminus2), high, 54.3 xhigh (Tables 2 and 5) Capabilities
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 60.7 Terminal-Bench 2.1, Terminus 2 harness, 3 hour timeout, mean of 8 runs (Table 10) Capabilities
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B technical report 24.4 Terminal-Bench v2.1, BF16 acc. (Table 22) Capabilities
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B technical report 51 Terminal-Bench 2.1, released 24GB checkpoint (Table 7). BF16 53.93 Capabilities
22 Sep 2026 MiMo-V2.6 Pro technical report 89.9 Terminal Bench 2.1 (Table 3) Capabilities
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash technical report 90.6 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Pass@1), DeepSeek Harness Minimal (Table 3, Table 4) Capabilities
2 Sep 2026 Gemini 3.8 Flash model card 89.4 Terminal-bench 2.1 (results table, p.5) Capabilities
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash model card 85.8 Terminal-bench 2.1 (results table, p.5) Capabilities
5 Aug 2026 K-EXAONE 2.0 technical report 43.8 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Table 6, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small model card 64.7 Terminal Bench 2.1, best harness (5. Evaluations table) Capabilities
27 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 88.3 Terminal-Bench 2.1, best score across harnesses (Table 2) Capabilities
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.6 Flash model card 78 Terminal-bench 2.1, Terminus-2 harness (results table, p.4) Capabilities
21 Jul 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model card 54 Terminal-bench 2.1, Terminus-2 harness (results table, p.4) Capabilities
15 Jul 2026 Inkling model card 63.8 Terminal Bench 2.1, best harness, contaminated rollouts scored 0 (5. Evaluations table, effort 0.99) Capabilities
14 Jul 2026 Grok 4.5 model card 83.3 Terminal-Bench 2.1, task success rate, high, Grok Build harness (2.9) Capabilities
9 Jul 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 80 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Figure 44) Capabilities
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 80.4 Terminal-Bench 2.1, mean reward over 5 attempts on 89 tasks at xhigh effort, mini-SWE-agent harness (Table 8.1.A, 8.3) Capabilities
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 71 Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Table 5) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra technical report 56.4 Terminal Bench 2.1 (Table 10) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 84.3 Terminal-Bench 2.1, mini-SWE-agent harness, mean reward over 5 attempts on 89 tasks, high effort, 20.9% of trials hit a safety refusal and fell back to Opus 4.8 (Table 8.1.A, 8.3) Capabilities
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 74.6 Terminal-Bench 2.1 mean reward on Harbor with the Terminus-2 harness, high effort, 5 attempts on each of 89 tasks (Table 8.1.A, 8.3) Capabilities
19 May 2026 Gemini 3.5 Flash model card 76.2 Terminal-bench 2.1, Terminus-2 harness (results table, p.4) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Anthropic OpenAI Google DeepMind Cognition
Terminal-Bench 4.0 20 leaders
Terminal-Bench Replaced by 2.0, Dec 2025
Terminal-Bench 2.0 Replaced by 2.1, Jul 2026
GPT-5.5 84.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Claude Fable 5
SWE-2 92.8%
Terminal-Bench 3.0 Replaced by 4.0, Sep 2026

More in Terminal agents

All 18 in Terminal agents
  • SkillsBench In use 86-87 containerized expert tasks in 11 domains, run with and without Agent Skills. Verifier tests give pass rate and skill lift. GPT-5.5 67.3%
  • Terminal-Bench Hard In use Agents complete 44 hard tasks from Terminal-Bench Core in the Terminus 2 harness. Artificial Analysis scores pass@1 averaged over 3 repeats. Gemma 4 31B IT 36%
  • Harbor-Index In use Agents solve about 80 hard tasks drawn from 29 benchmarks run through Harbor adapters, such as HLE, GSO and SWE-bench Pro. Each task keeps its source verifier. GPT-5.5 28.1%
  • CompileBench Not in model cards Agents build real open-source projects through dependency problems, legacy toolchains and complex build systems, for example compiling 22-year-old code. Claude Opus 4.1 100%
  • Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0 Not in model cards Agents work for up to 3 hours per task on 77 container tasks, including 30 tasks that rebuild a scientific tool from its outputs. Hidden verifiers give partial-credit rewards. GPT-6 Astra 69.2%
  • ITBench Not in model cards Agents handle IT automation tasks in Kubernetes environments: site reliability incidents, compliance and security checks, and cloud cost work. Gemini 3 Pro 58.3%