TableBench
Models answer 886 questions about real-world tables across 18 fields in four groups: fact checking, numerical reasoning, data analysis and visualization. Fact and numeric answers are scored by exact match, analysis answers by ROUGE-L, and chart code by pass@1.
AAAI 2025. In April 2025 the authors released a cleaned test set and new metrics, so earlier scores are not comparable. 53 HF paper upvotes and about 97 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- Beihang University, M-A-P and collaborators
- Released
- August 2024
- Kind
- Language reasoning
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have markedly enhanced the interpretation and processing of tabular data, introducing previously unimaginable capabilities. Despite these achievements, LLMs still encounter significant challenges when applied in industrial scenarios, particularly due to the increased complexity of reasoning required with real-world tabular data, underscoring a notable disparity between academic benchmarks and practical applications. To address this discrepancy, we conduct a detailed investigation into the application of tabular data in industrial scenarios and propose a comprehensive and complex benchmark TableBench, including 18 fields within four major categories of table question answering (TableQA) capabilities. Furthermore, we introduce TableLLM, trained on our meticulously constructed training set TableInstruct, achieving comparable performance with GPT-3.5. Massive experiments conducted on TableBench indicate that both open-source and proprietary LLMs still have significant room for improvement to meet real-world demands, where the most advanced model, GPT-4, achieves only a modest score compared to humans.
AskRUI tops the leaderboard with 84.6%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is o4-mini, at 61.7%.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 84.6 AskRUI
- 83.0 WPS AI
- 82.3 JT-DA-Agent
- 80.6 MUSE PULSE
- 79.4 Data Analysis Agent
- 74.6 ReVi-Agent
- 74.3 JoyDataAgent
- 72.8 raccoonAgent
- 71.7 ExcelClaw-Agent
- 67.4 Qingqiu Agent
- 64.1 ButtonAgent
- 63.5 CellPilot-v2
- 62.1 RankAgent
- 61.7 o4-mini
- 59.9 GPT-5
- 59.9 o3-mini
- 57.8 Grok 4
- 57.2 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 56.3 Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 54.8 Claude4-Sonnet
- 52.7 Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct
- 52.5
Qwen3-32B
- 52.0 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 51.5 GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified)
- 50.6 Deepseek-Chat-V3
- 48.9 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct
- 48.8
Qwen2.5-72B
- 46.5 Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
- 45.5
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct
- 43.9
QwQ-32B
- 41.0 Llama3.1-70B-Instruct
- 41.0 TableGPT2-7B
- 38.7 Llama3-70B-Chat
- 38.7 Llama3-70B-Instruct
- 37.1 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified)
- 35.1 Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct
- 31.9 TableLLM-Qwen2-7B
- 30.8 TableLLM-Llama3.1-8B
- 30.5 TableLLM-DeepseekCoder-7B
- 29.8 TableLLM-Llama3-8B
- 24.8 TableLLM-CodeQwen-7B
- 22.2 Llama3-8B-Chat
- 22.2 Llama3-8B-Instruct
- 22.1 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
- 21.7 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct
- 21.7 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1
- 15.4 Llama3.1-8B-Instruct
- 11.0
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1
- 11.0
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2
- 1 AskRUI 84.6%
- 2 WPS AI 83%
- 3 JT-DA-Agent 82.3%
- 4 MUSE PULSE 80.6%
- 5 Data Analysis Agent 79.4%
- 6 ReVi-Agent 74.6%
- 7 JoyDataAgent 74.3%
- 8 raccoonAgent 72.8%
- 9 ExcelClaw-Agent 71.7%
- 10 Qingqiu Agent 67.4%
- 11 ButtonAgent 64.1%
- 12 CellPilot-v2 63.5%
- 13 RankAgent 62.1%
- 14 o4-mini high; DP 61.7%
- 15 GPT-5 DP 59.9%
- 16 o3-mini DP 59.9%
- 17 Grok 4 DP 57.8%
- 18 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) DP 57.2%
- 19 Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) DP 56.3%
- 20 Claude4-Sonnet DP 54.8%
- 21 Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct TCoT 52.7%
- 22
Qwen3-32B 52.5%
- 23 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) TCoT 52%
- 24 GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) TCoT 51.5%
- 25 Deepseek-Chat-V3 TCoT 50.6%
- 26 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct TCoT 48.9%
- 27
Qwen2.5-72B TCoT 48.8%
- 28 Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct TCoT 46.5%
- 29
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct TCoT 45.5%
- 30
QwQ-32B DP 43.9%
- 31 Llama3.1-70B-Instruct TCoT 41%
- 32 TableGPT2-7B TCoT 41%
- 33 Llama3-70B-Chat TCoT 38.7%
- 34 Llama3-70B-Instruct TCoT 38.7%
- 35 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) PoT 37.1%
- 36 Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct TCoT 35.1%
- 37 TableLLM-Qwen2-7B TCoT 31.9%
- 38 TableLLM-Llama3.1-8B TCoT 30.8%
- 39 TableLLM-DeepseekCoder-7B TCoT 30.5%
- 40 TableLLM-Llama3-8B TCoT 29.8%
- 41 TableLLM-CodeQwen-7B TCoT 24.8%
- 42 Llama3-8B-Chat SCoT 22.2%
- 43 Llama3-8B-Instruct SCoT 22.2%
- 44 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct TCoT 22.1%
- 45 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct PoT 21.7%
- 46 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 PoT 21.7%
- 47 Llama3.1-8B-Instruct DP 15.4%
- 48
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1 SCoT 11%
- 49
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 SCoT 11%
Source: Official TableBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AskRUI | 84.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | WPS AI | 83% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | JT-DA-Agent | 82.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | MUSE PULSE | 80.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Data Analysis Agent | 79.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | ReVi-Agent | 74.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | JoyDataAgent | 74.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | raccoonAgent | 72.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | ExcelClaw-Agent | 71.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Qingqiu Agent | 67.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | ButtonAgent | 64.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | CellPilot-v2 | 63.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | RankAgent | 62.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | o4-mini | 61.7% | high; DP | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5 | 59.9% | DP | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | o3-mini | 59.9% | DP | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Grok 4 | 57.8% | DP | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 57.2% | DP | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 56.3% | DP | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude4-Sonnet | 54.8% | DP | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | 52.7% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 52.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 52% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 51.5% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Deepseek-Chat-V3 | 50.6% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct | 48.9% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 48.8% | TCoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | 46.5% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 45.5% | TCoT | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | | 43.9% | DP | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | Llama3.1-70B-Instruct | 41% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | TableGPT2-7B | 41% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | Llama3-70B-Chat | 38.7% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | Llama3-70B-Instruct | 38.7% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 37.1% | PoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct | 35.1% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | TableLLM-Qwen2-7B | 31.9% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | TableLLM-Llama3.1-8B | 30.8% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | TableLLM-DeepseekCoder-7B | 30.5% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | TableLLM-Llama3-8B | 29.8% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | TableLLM-CodeQwen-7B | 24.8% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Llama3-8B-Chat | 22.2% | SCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | Llama3-8B-Instruct | 22.2% | SCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | 22.1% | TCoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct | 21.7% | PoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 | 21.7% | PoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | Llama3.1-8B-Instruct | 15.4% | DP | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 11% | SCoT | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 49 | | 11% | SCoT | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official TableBench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| o4-mini | high; DP | 61.7% | |||
| o4-mini | DP | 60.8% | |||
| GPT-5 | DP | 59.9% | |||
| o3-mini | DP | 59.9% | |||
| Grok 4 | DP | 57.8% | |||
| | 52.5% | ||||
| | DP | 52.5% | |||
| | TCoT | 48.8% | |||
| | TCoT | 45.5% | |||
| | DP | 43.9% | |||
| | TCoT | 43.5% | |||
| | PoT | 42.4% | |||
| | PoT | 38.7% | |||
| | SCoT | 37.1% | |||
| | SCoT | 36% | |||
| | PoT | 31.6% | |||
| | SCoT | 30.2% | |||
| | DP | 27.5% | |||
| | DP | 27% | |||
| | SCoT | 11% | |||
| | SCoT | 11% | |||
| | DP | 10.8% | |||
| | TCoT | 10.8% | |||
| | PoT | 2.53% |
4 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official TableBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official TableBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%