Benchmark Almanac

TableBench

AskRUI 84.6% tops its leaderboard o4-mini 61.7% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models answer 886 questions about real-world tables across 18 fields in four groups: fact checking, numerical reasoning, data analysis and visualization. Fact and numeric answers are scored by exact match, analysis answers by ROUGE-L, and chart code by pass@1.

AAAI 2025. In April 2025 the authors released a cleaned test set and new metrics, so earlier scores are not comparable. 53 HF paper upvotes and about 97 GitHub stars.

Released
August 2024
Kind
Language reasoning
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last model added
August 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have markedly enhanced the interpretation and processing of tabular data, introducing previously unimaginable capabilities. Despite these achievements, LLMs still encounter significant challenges when applied in industrial scenarios, particularly due to the increased complexity of reasoning required with real-world tabular data, underscoring a notable disparity between academic benchmarks and practical applications. To address this discrepancy, we conduct a detailed investigation into the application of tabular data in industrial scenarios and propose a comprehensive and complex benchmark TableBench, including 18 fields within four major categories of table question answering (TableQA) capabilities. Furthermore, we introduce TableLLM, trained on our meticulously constructed training set TableInstruct, achieving comparable performance with GPT-3.5. Massive experiments conducted on TableBench indicate that both open-source and proprietary LLMs still have significant room for improvement to meet real-world demands, where the most advanced model, GPT-4, achieves only a modest score compared to humans.

Abstract of TableBench: A Comprehensive and Complex Benchmark for Table Question Answering (arXiv:2408.09174, CC0)
49
Entries on its own leaderboard, 10 models we track

AskRUI tops the leaderboard with 84.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is o4-mini, at 61.7%.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 AskRUI 84.6%
  2. 2 WPS AI 83%
  3. 3 JT-DA-Agent 82.3%
  4. 4 MUSE PULSE 80.6%
  5. 5 Data Analysis Agent 79.4%
  6. 6 ReVi-Agent 74.6%
  7. 7 JoyDataAgent 74.3%
  8. 8 raccoonAgent 72.8%
  9. 9 ExcelClaw-Agent 71.7%
  10. 10 Qingqiu Agent 67.4%
  11. 11 ButtonAgent 64.1%
  12. 12 CellPilot-v2 63.5%
  13. 13 RankAgent 62.1%
  14. 14 o4-mini high; DP 61.7%
  15. 15 GPT-5 DP 59.9%
  16. 16 o3-mini DP 59.9%
  17. 17 Grok 4 DP 57.8%
  18. 18 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) DP 57.2%
  19. 19 Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) DP 56.3%
  20. 20 Claude4-Sonnet DP 54.8%
  21. 21 Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct TCoT 52.7%
  22. 22 Qwen3-32B 52.5%
  23. 23 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) TCoT 52%
  24. 24 GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) TCoT 51.5%
  25. 25 Deepseek-Chat-V3 TCoT 50.6%
  26. 26 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct TCoT 48.9%
  27. 27 Qwen2.5-72B TCoT 48.8%
  28. 28 Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct TCoT 46.5%
  29. 29 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct TCoT 45.5%
  30. 30 QwQ-32B DP 43.9%
  31. 31 Llama3.1-70B-Instruct TCoT 41%
  32. 32 TableGPT2-7B TCoT 41%
  33. 33 Llama3-70B-Chat TCoT 38.7%
  34. 34 Llama3-70B-Instruct TCoT 38.7%
  35. 35 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) PoT 37.1%
  36. 36 Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct TCoT 35.1%
  37. 37 TableLLM-Qwen2-7B TCoT 31.9%
  38. 38 TableLLM-Llama3.1-8B TCoT 30.8%
  39. 39 TableLLM-DeepseekCoder-7B TCoT 30.5%
  40. 40 TableLLM-Llama3-8B TCoT 29.8%
  41. 41 TableLLM-CodeQwen-7B TCoT 24.8%
  42. 42 Llama3-8B-Chat SCoT 22.2%
  43. 43 Llama3-8B-Instruct SCoT 22.2%
  44. 44 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct TCoT 22.1%
  45. 45 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct PoT 21.7%
  46. 46 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 PoT 21.7%
  47. 47 Llama3.1-8B-Instruct DP 15.4%
  48. 48 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1 SCoT 11%
  49. 49 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 SCoT 11%

Source: Official TableBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 AskRUI 84.6% Official leaderboard
2 WPS AI 83% Official leaderboard
3 JT-DA-Agent 82.3% Official leaderboard
4 MUSE PULSE 80.6% Official leaderboard
5 Data Analysis Agent 79.4% Official leaderboard
6 ReVi-Agent 74.6% Official leaderboard
7 JoyDataAgent 74.3% Official leaderboard
8 raccoonAgent 72.8% Official leaderboard
9 ExcelClaw-Agent 71.7% Official leaderboard
10 Qingqiu Agent 67.4% Official leaderboard
11 ButtonAgent 64.1% Official leaderboard
12 CellPilot-v2 63.5% Official leaderboard
13 RankAgent 62.1% Official leaderboard
14 o4-mini 61.7% high; DP Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5 59.9% DP Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
16 o3-mini 59.9% DP Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Grok 4 57.8% DP Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 57.2% DP Official leaderboard
19 Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 56.3% DP Official leaderboard
20 Claude4-Sonnet 54.8% DP Official leaderboard
21 Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct 52.7% TCoT Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3-32B 52.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 52% TCoT Official leaderboard
24 GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 51.5% TCoT Official leaderboard
25 Deepseek-Chat-V3 50.6% TCoT Official leaderboard
26 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct 48.9% TCoT Official leaderboard
27 Qwen2.5-72B 48.8% TCoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
28 Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct 46.5% TCoT Official leaderboard
29 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 45.5% TCoT Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
30 QwQ-32B 43.9% DP Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
31 Llama3.1-70B-Instruct 41% TCoT Official leaderboard
32 TableGPT2-7B 41% TCoT Official leaderboard
33 Llama3-70B-Chat 38.7% TCoT Official leaderboard
34 Llama3-70B-Instruct 38.7% TCoT Official leaderboard
35 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 37.1% PoT Official leaderboard
36 Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct 35.1% TCoT Official leaderboard
37 TableLLM-Qwen2-7B 31.9% TCoT Official leaderboard
38 TableLLM-Llama3.1-8B 30.8% TCoT Official leaderboard
39 TableLLM-DeepseekCoder-7B 30.5% TCoT Official leaderboard
40 TableLLM-Llama3-8B 29.8% TCoT Official leaderboard
41 TableLLM-CodeQwen-7B 24.8% TCoT Official leaderboard
42 Llama3-8B-Chat 22.2% SCoT Official leaderboard
43 Llama3-8B-Instruct 22.2% SCoT Official leaderboard
44 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct 22.1% TCoT Official leaderboard
45 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct 21.7% PoT Official leaderboard
46 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 21.7% PoT Official leaderboard
47 Llama3.1-8B-Instruct 15.4% DP Official leaderboard
48 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1 11% SCoT Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
49 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 11% SCoT Dec 2023 Official leaderboard

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
o4-mini
DP
61.7%
Qwen3-32B
DP
52.5%
Qwen2.5-72B
DP SCoT PoT TCoT
48.8%
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct
DP PoT TCoT
45.5%
QwQ-32B
PoT TCoT
43.9%
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2
PoT TCoT
11%

Source: Official TableBench leaderboard

4 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Mistral AI Qwen OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2025
o4-mini 61.7%

Source: Official TableBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) o4-mini Qwen2.5-72B Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) o4-mini Qwen2.5-72B

Source: Official TableBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Knowledge

All 121 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%