Benchmark Almanac

T-Eval

Qwen1.5-72B 76.7% Dropped

Models use tools step by step, and each sub-process is scored separately: instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review.

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLM) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks and are augmented by tools for broader applications. Yet, how to evaluate and analyze the tool-utilization capability of LLMs is still under-explored. In contrast to previous works that evaluate models holistically, we comprehensively decompose the tool utilization into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review. Based on that, we further introduce T-Eval to evaluate the tool utilization capability step by step. T-Eval disentangles the tool utilization evaluation into several sub-domains along model capabilities, facilitating the inner understanding of both holistic and isolated competency of LLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on T-Eval and in-depth analysis of various LLMs. T-Eval not only exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation but also provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs, providing a new perspective in LLM evaluation on tool-utilization ability. The benchmark will be available at https://github.com/open-compass/T-Eval.

Abstract of T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Step (arXiv:2312.14033, CC0)
Made by Shanghai AI Laboratory (OpenCompass) Released Dec 2023 Function calling All tasks public Last in a launch post Mar 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Mar 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs

Qwen1.5-72B leads with 76.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Qwen1.5-72B 76.7%
  2. 2 Hunyuan-T1 68.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen1.5-72B 76.7% Feb 2024 Model card
2 Hunyuan-T1 68.8% Mar 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen1.5-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen1.5-72B

No launch post has listed it since Mar 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
21 Mar 2025 Hunyuan-T1 68.8 T-Eval
5 Feb 2024 Qwen1.5-72B 76.7 T-Eval English (Overall)

More in Tool use

All 125 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%